Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33172131›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Instrumented Analysis of the Sit-to-Stand Movement for Geriatric Screening: A Systematic Review.

Brajesh Shukla, Jennifer Bassement, Vivek Vijay, Sandeep Yadav, David Hewson

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Age-dependent synergistic control of sit-to-stand motion.European journal of applied physiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Brajesh ShuklaSystem Science, Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur, Jodhpur 342037, India.
Jennifer BassementHuman and Life Sciences, Laboratoire d'Automatique, de Mécanique et d'Informatique industrielles et Humaines, Université Polytechnique Hauts-de-France, 59300 Valenciennes, France.
Vivek VijayDepartment of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur, Jodhpur 342037, India.
Sandeep YadavDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur, Jodhpur 342037, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7337-1134
David HewsonInstitute for Health Research, University of Bedfordshire, Luton LU1 3JU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7656-4000
Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur · INUniversité Polytechnique Hauts-de-France · FRUniversity of Bedfordshire · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Sit-to-Stand (STS) is a widely used test of physical function to screen older people at risk of falls and frailty and is also one of the most important components of standard screening for sarcopenia. There have been many recent studies in which instrumented versions of the STS (iSTS) have been developed to provide additional parameters that could improve the accuracy of the STS test. This systematic review aimed to identify whether an iSTS is a viable alternative to a standard STS to identify older people at risk of falling, frailty, and sarcopenia. A total of 856 articles were found using the search strategy developed, with 12 articles retained in the review after screening based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Six studies evaluated the iSTS in fallers, five studies in frailty and only one study in both fallers and frailty. The results showed that power and velocity parameters extracted from an iSTS have the potential to improve the accuracy of screening when compared to a standard STS. Future work should focus on standardizing the segmentation of the STS into phases to enable comparison between studies and to develop devices integrated into the chair used for the test to improve usability.

Indexed as

biomedical monitoringfunctional screeningIMUKinectRGB camerasit-to-stand

Identifiers

PMID33172131
PMCPMC7711962
OpenAlexW3097410173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.