Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33172128›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Consumers' Implicit and Explicit Recall, Understanding and Perceptions of Products with Nutrition-Related Messages: An Online Survey.

Beatriz Franco-Arellano, Lana Vanderlee, Mavra Ahmed, Angela Oh, Mary R L'Abbé

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Beatriz Franco-ArellanoDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Medical Sciences Building, 1 King's College Circle Rm 5368, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada.
Lana VanderleeDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Medical Sciences Building, 1 King's College Circle Rm 5368, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada.
Mavra AhmedDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Medical Sciences Building, 1 King's College Circle Rm 5368, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada.
Angela OhDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Medical Sciences Building, 1 King's College Circle Rm 5368, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada.
Mary R L'AbbéDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Medical Sciences Building, 1 King's College Circle Rm 5368, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada.
University of New Brunswick · CAUniversity of Toronto · CACanada Research Chairs · CA

Funding

CIHR 201103SOK-118150 (MRL)CIHR 2016PJT-152979 (MRL)CIHR Banting Postdoctoral Fellow (LV)CIHR GSD-152299 (BFA)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to assess consumers' implicit and explicit recall, understanding and perceptions of products with a nutrition claim and a symbol depicting 'health,' and to determine whether these perceptions differed among Nutrition Facts table (NFt) users vs. nonusers. In an online survey, participants (n = 1997) were randomized to one of eight conditions in a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design, consisting of a label with a claim (present/absent) a heart-shaped symbol depicting 'health' (present/absent) for a healthier or less healthy soup. Participants were shown a label for 10 s and asked whether they recalled seeing a claim. If participants answered yes, they were then asked to describe their response using open-ended questions. Participants also rated the product's perceived nutritional quality and purchase intentions using seven-point Likert scales. In the claim condition, most participants (75%) were able to recall the presence of a claim, while 12% incorrectly mentioned the presence of a claim when there was none. Claims likely attracted consumers' attention and increased perceived nutritional quality, although with limited influence among NFt users (23%). The symbol depicting 'health' did not enhance perceived nutritional quality or purchase intentions. Although most participants (77%) made their decisions implicitly using the front of labels, those who used the NFt had a better understanding of the nutritional quality of products.

Indexed as

Food LabelingFood PreferencesChildChoice BehaviorConsumer BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleNutritive ValuePerceptionSurveys and QuestionnairesCanadaconsumer perceptionsnutrient declarationsnutrition claimsnutrition labellingsymbols

Identifiers

PMID33172128
PMCPMC7664426
OpenAlexW3095107079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.