Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33172075›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

The Trained Sniffer Dog Could Accurately Detect the Urine Samples from the Patients with Cervical Cancer, and Even Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 3: A Pilot Study.

Akihito Yamamoto, Seiryu Kamoi, Keisuke Kurose, Marie Ito, Toshiyuki Takeshita, Shoko Kure, Katsuichi Sakamoto, Yuji Sato, Masao Miyashita

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Akihito YamamotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9158-4897
Seiryu KamoiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan.
Keisuke KuroseDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan.
Marie ItoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan.
Toshiyuki TakeshitaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan.
Shoko KureDepartment of Pathology and Integrative Oncological Pathology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo 113-8602, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9536-9438
Katsuichi SakamotoDepartment of Gynecology, Jizankai Medical Foundation Tsuboi Cancer Center Hospital, Fukushima 963-0197, Japan.
Yuji SatoCancer Sniffing Dog Training Center, St. Sugar Japan, Chiba 294-0226, Japan.
Masao MiyashitaNippon Medical School, Tokyo 113-8602, Japan.
Nippon Medical School · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Previous reports have indicated that cancers of the stomach, lung, and pancreas can be detected by dog sniffing, but results have been varied. Here, a highly trained dog was used to determine whether urine from patients with cervical premalignant lesions and malignant tumors have a cancer-specific scent. (2) Methods: A total of 195 urine samples were collected from patients with cervical cancer, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3), benign uterine diseases, and healthy volunteers. Each test was performed using one urine sample from a cancer patient and four samples from different controls. Each of the five urine samples was placed in a separate box. When the cancer sniffing dog stopped and sat in front of the box with a sample from a cancer patient, the test was considered as positive. (3) Results: 83 patients with cervical cancer (34 cases of cervical cancer and 49 cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3), 49 patients with uterine benign diseases, and 63 healthy volunteers were enrolled, and their urine samples were collected. In 83 times out of 83 runs in a double-blind test, the trained dog could correctly identify urine samples of cervical cancer patients. (4) Conclusion: A trained dog could accurately distinguish the urine of all patients with cervical cancer or CIN3, regardless of the degree of cancer progression.

Indexed as

cervix uteridogsodorantsurinevolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID33172075
PMCPMC7694610
OpenAlexW3095576656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.