Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33172065›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Intravital Assessment of Blood Platelet Function. A Review of the Methodological Approaches with Examples of Studies of Selected Aspects of Blood Platelet Function.

Dawid Polak, Marcin Talar, Cezary Watala, Tomasz Przygodzki

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Human Disabled-2 regulates thromboxane ANature communications · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. ACS sensors · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dawid PolakDepartment of Haemostasis and Haemostatic Disorders, Chair of Biomedical Sciences, Medical University of Lodz, 92-215 Lodz, Poland.
Marcin TalarDepartment of Haemostasis and Haemostatic Disorders, Chair of Biomedical Sciences, Medical University of Lodz, 92-215 Lodz, Poland.
Cezary WatalaDepartment of Haemostasis and Haemostatic Disorders, Chair of Biomedical Sciences, Medical University of Lodz, 92-215 Lodz, Poland.
Tomasz PrzygodzkiDepartment of Haemostasis and Haemostatic Disorders, Chair of Biomedical Sciences, Medical University of Lodz, 92-215 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4937-8621
Medical University of Lodz · PL

Funding

Fundacja na rzecz Nauki Polskiej TEAM/2016-1/8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Platelet biology owes to intravital studies not only a better understanding of platelets' role in primary hemostasis but also findings that platelets are important factors in inflammation and atherosclerosis. Researchers who enter the field of intravital platelet studies may be confused by the heterogeneity of experimental protocols utilized. On the one hand, there are a variety of stimuli used to activate platelet response, and on the other hand there are several approaches to measure the outcome of the activation. A number of possible combinations of activation factors with measurement approaches result in the aforementioned heterogeneity. The aim of this review is to present the most often used protocols in a systematic way depending on the stimulus used to activate platelets. By providing examples of studies performed with each of the protocols, we attempt to explain why a particular combination of stimuli and measurement method was applied to study a given aspect of platelet biology.

Indexed as

AnimalsAtherosclerosisBlood PlateletsHemostasisHumansInflammationPlatelet ActivationPlatelet AggregationPlatelet Function TestsThrombosisatherosclerosisinflammationintravital studiesmetastasisplateletsthrombosis

Identifiers

PMID33172065
PMCPMC7664321
OpenAlexW3095753034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.