Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33172021›Full record

ReviewCancers2020

Liquid Biopsy for Solid Ophthalmic Malignancies: An Updated Review and Perspectives.

Arnaud Martel, Stephanie Baillif, Sacha Nahon-Esteve, Lauris Gastaud, Corine Bertolotto, Barnabé Roméo, Baharia Mograbi, Sandra Lassalle, Paul Hofman

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Blood-Based Cell-Free DNA in Ophthalmic Oncology.Translational vision science & technology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Arnaud MartelOphthalmology Department, University Hospital, Cote d'Azur University of Nice, 06 000 Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3836-7126
Stephanie BaillifOphthalmology Department, University Hospital, Cote d'Azur University of Nice, 06 000 Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1700-8570
Sacha Nahon-EsteveOphthalmology Department, University Hospital, Cote d'Azur University of Nice, 06 000 Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2274-0256
Lauris GastaudOncology Department, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Centre, 06 000 Nice, France.
Corine BertolottoCentre Méditerranéen de Médecine Moléculaire (C3M), INSERM, Université Nice Côte d'Azur, 06 200 Nice, France.
Barnabé RoméoCNRS UMR7284, Inserm U1081, Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging Nice (IRCAN), FHU OncoAge, Cote d'Azur University, 06 000 Nice, France.
Baharia MograbiCNRS UMR7284, Inserm U1081, Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging Nice (IRCAN), FHU OncoAge, Cote d'Azur University, 06 000 Nice, France.
Sandra LassalleCNRS UMR7284, Inserm U1081, Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging Nice (IRCAN), FHU OncoAge, Cote d'Azur University, 06 000 Nice, France.
Paul HofmanCNRS UMR7284, Inserm U1081, Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging Nice (IRCAN), FHU OncoAge, Cote d'Azur University, 06 000 Nice, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCentre Antoine Lacassagne · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue biopsy is considered the gold standard when establishing a diagnosis of cancer. However, tissue biopsies of intraocular ophthalmic malignancies are hard to collect and are thought to be associated with a non-negligible risk of extraocular dissemination. Recently, the liquid biopsy (LB) has emerged as a viable, non-invasive, repeatable, and promising way of obtaining a diagnosis, prognosis, and theragnosis of patients with solid tumors. LB refers to blood, as well as any human liquid. The natural history of uveal melanoma (UM) and retinoblastoma (RB) are radically opposed. On the one hand, UM is known to disseminate through the bloodstream, and is, therefore, more accessible to systemic venous liquid biopsy. On the other hand, RB rarely disseminates hematogenous, and is, therefore, more accessible to local liquid biopsy by performing an anterior chamber puncture. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge concerning LB in UM, RB, conjunctival tumors, and choroidal metastases. We also develop the current limitations encountered, as well as the perspectives.

Indexed as

circulating tumor cellscirculating tumor DNAliquid biopsyretinoblastomauveal melanoma

Identifiers

PMID33172021
PMCPMC7694640
OpenAlexW3096644460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.