Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33171964›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2020

The Effects of Non-Nutritive Artificial Sweeteners, Aspartame and Sucralose, on the Gut Microbiome in Healthy Adults: Secondary Outcomes of a Randomized Double-Blinded Crossover Clinical Trial.

Samar Y Ahmad, James Friel, Dylan Mackay

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07124585 (Short-Term Effect of Non-Nutritive Sweeteners), which is not on this map. Cited by 63 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07124585 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Short-Term Effect of Non-Nutritive Sweeteners (Sucralose and Saccharin) Consumption on Glycaemic Control and Gut Microbiota in Type 2 Diabetes Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational University of MalaysiaRan2026 to 2027Enrolled33ConditionsType 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)ArmsSucralose, Saccharin, Placebo (Calcium Carbonate)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samar Y AhmadRichardson Centre for Functional Foods and Nutraceuticals, Department of Human Nutritional Sciences, University of Manitoba, 196 Innovation Drive, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2E1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1719-6508
James FrielRichardson Centre for Functional Foods and Nutraceuticals, Department of Human Nutritional Sciences, University of Manitoba, 196 Innovation Drive, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2E1, Canada.
Dylan MackayRichardson Centre for Functional Foods and Nutraceuticals, Department of Human Nutritional Sciences, University of Manitoba, 196 Innovation Drive, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2E1, Canada.
University of Manitoba · CA

Funding

KUWAIT FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCES P115-63MM-01UNIVERSITY COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM 45596
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-nutritive artificial sweeteners (NNSs) may have the ability to change the gut microbiota, which could potentially alter glucose metabolism. This study aimed to determine the effect of sucralose and aspartame consumption on gut microbiota composition using realistic doses of NNSs. Seventeen healthy participants between the ages of 18 and 45 years who had a body mass index (BMI) of 20-25 were selected. They undertook two 14-day treatment periods separated by a four-week washout period. The sweeteners consumed by each participant consisted of a standardized dose of 14% (0.425 g) of the acceptable daily intake (ADI) for aspartame and 20% (0.136 g) of the ADI for sucralose. Faecal samples collected before and after treatments were analysed for microbiome and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). There were no differences in the median relative proportions of the most abundant bacterial taxa (family and genus) before and after treatments with both NNSs. The microbiota community structure also did not show any obvious differences. There were no differences in faecal SCFAs following the consumption of the NNSs. These findings suggest that daily repeated consumption of pure aspartame or sucralose in doses reflective of typical high consumption have minimal effect on gut microbiota composition or SCFA production.

Indexed as

HealthAdolescentAdultAnalysis of VarianceAspartameBiodiversityCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFatty Acids, VolatileFecesFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansMaleMetabolomicsMiddle AgedAspartameFatty Acids, VolatileNon-Nutritive SweetenersSucrosetrichlorosucroseaspartamegut microbiomenon-nutritive sweetenerprotocolrandomized clinical trialsucralose

Identifiers

PMID33171964
PMCPMC7694690
OpenAlexW3095365210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.