Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33171892›Full record

ReviewInsects2020

Vimbai L Tarusikirwa, Honest Machekano, Reyard Mutamiswa, Frank Chidawanyika, Casper Nyamukondiwa

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insects, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. TransformingInsects · 2025
    Review
  5. Screening of Highly VirulentPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Floral Resource Integration: Enhancing Biocontrol ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Group-Living SpiderInsects · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Vimbai L TarusikirwaDepartment of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Botswana International University of Science and Technology, Palapye, Botswana.ORCID 0000-0002-9960-9945
Honest MachekanoDepartment of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Botswana International University of Science and Technology, Palapye, Botswana.
Reyard MutamiswaDepartment of Zoology and Entomology, University of the Free State, P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-3978-8643
Frank ChidawanyikaDepartment of Zoology and Entomology, University of the Free State, P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-4601-768X
Casper NyamukondiwaDepartment of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Botswana International University of Science and Technology, Palapye, Botswana.ORCID 0000-0002-0395-4980
Botswana International University of Science and Technology · BWUniversity of the Free State · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The South American tomato pinworm

Indexed as

botanicalsinvasive speciesliabilitiesnatural substancespest managementtomato pinworm

Identifiers

PMID33171892
PMCPMC7694550
OpenAlexW3095496347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.