Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33171695›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Efficiency of Wheat Straw Biochar in Combination with Compost and Biogas Slurry for Enhancing Nutritional Status and Productivity of Soil and Plant.

Aown Abbas, Muhammad Naveed, Muhammad Azeem, Muhammad Yaseen, Rehmat Ullah, Saud Alamri, Qurrat Ul Ain Farooq, Manzer H Siddiqui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aown AbbasInstitute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad 38040, Punjab, Pakistan.
Muhammad NaveedInstitute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad 38040, Punjab, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-2759-6049
Muhammad AzeemCollege of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A & F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Muhammad YaseenInstitute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad 38040, Punjab, Pakistan.
Rehmat UllahDepartment of Agriculture, Soil and Water Testing Laboratory, Dera Ghazi Khan 32200, Pakistan.
Saud AlamriDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Qurrat Ul Ain FarooqPhytophthora Science and Management, Environmental and Conservation Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.
Manzer H SiddiquiDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2840-4608

Funding

King Saud University Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2020/194)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present study, we investigated the impact of different combinations of wheat straw biochar, compost and biogas slurry on maize growth, physiology, and nutritional status in less productive soils. The experiment was performed as a completely randomized block design in a greenhouse pot experiment. The compost and biogas slurry were applied with and without biochar. The results revealed that a combination of biochar, compost, and biogas slurry enhanced the cation exchange capacity (31%), carbon (83%), phosphorus (67%) and potassium (81%) contents in the soil. Likewise, a significant increase in soil microbial biomass carbon (15%) and nitrogen (37%) was noticed with the combined use of all organic amendments. Moreover, the combined application of biochar, compost and biogas slurry enhanced soil urease and β-glucosidase activity up to 96% and 67% over control respectively. In addition, plant height, chlorophyll content, water use efficiency and 1000-grain weight were also enhanced up to 54%, 90%, 53% and 21% respectively, with the combined use of all amendments. Here, biochar addition helped to reduce the nutrient losses of compost and biogas slurry as well. It is concluded that biochar application in combination with compost and biogas slurry could be a more sustainable, environment-friendly and cost-effective approach, particularly for less fertile soils.

Indexed as

biogas slurrycompostmaizesoil healthwheat straw biochar

Identifiers

PMID33171695
PMCPMC7695275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.