Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33171654›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2020

Continuous Electrical Stimulation Affects Initial Growth and Proliferation of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells.

Peer W Kämmerer, Vivien Engel, Franz Plocksties, Anika Jonitz-Heincke, Dirk Timmermann, Nadja Engel, Bernhard Frerich, Rainer Bader, Daniel G E Thiem, Anna Skorska and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peer W KämmererDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1671-3764
Vivien EngelDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Franz PlockstiesInstitute of Applied Microelectronics and Computer Engineering, University of Rostock, 18051 Rostock, Germany.
Anika Jonitz-HeinckeDepartment of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Dirk TimmermannInstitute of Applied Microelectronics and Computer Engineering, University of Rostock, 18051 Rostock, Germany.
Nadja EngelDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6362-9282
Bernhard FrerichDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Rainer BaderDepartment of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Daniel G E ThiemDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Anna SkorskaDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University Medical Center Rostock, 18059 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6287-4916
Robert DavidDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University Medical Center Rostock, 18059 Rostock, Germany.
Bilal Al-NawasDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8665-5803
Michael DauDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2619-3256
University of Rostock · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft CRC 1270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to establish electrical stimulation parameters in order to improve cell growth and viability of human adipose-derived stem cells (hADSC) when compared to non-stimulated cells in vitro. hADSC were exposed to continuous electrical stimulation with 1.7 V AC/20 Hz. After 24, 72 h and 7 days, cell number, cellular surface coverage and cell proliferation were assessed. In addition, cell cycle analysis was carried out after 3 and 7 days. After 24 h, no significant alterations were observed for stimulated cells. At day 3, stimulated cells showed a 4.5-fold increase in cell numbers, a 2.7-fold increase in cellular surface coverage and a significantly increased proliferation. Via cell cycle analysis, a significant increase in the G2/M phase was monitored for stimulated cells. Contrastingly, after 7 days, the non-stimulated group exhibited a 11-fold increase in cell numbers and a 4-fold increase in cellular surface coverage as well as a significant increase in cell proliferation. Moreover, the stimulated cells displayed a shift to the G1 and sub-G1 phase, indicating for metabolic arrest and apoptosis initiation. In accordance, continuous electrical stimulation of hADSC led to a significantly increased cell growth and proliferation after 3 days. However, longer stimulation periods such as 7 days caused an opposite result indicating initiation of apoptosis.

Indexed as

alternating currentcontinuous stimulationelectrical stimulationhuman adipose-derived stem cellsproliferationtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID33171654
PMCPMC7695310
OpenAlexW3098285353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.