Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33171609›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

An Investigation of Insider Threat Mitigation Based on EEG Signal Classification.

Jung Hwan Kim, Chul Min Kim, Man-Sung Yim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jung Hwan KimKorea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, Daejeon 34141, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6903-6771
Chul Min KimKorea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, Daejeon 34141, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7405-6600
Man-Sung YimKorea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, Daejeon 34141, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study proposes a scheme to identify insider threats in nuclear facilities through the detection of malicious intentions of potential insiders using subject-wise classification. Based on electroencephalography (EEG) signals, a classification model was developed to identify whether a subject has a malicious intention under scenarios of being forced to become an insider threat. The model also distinguishes insider threat scenarios from everyday conflict scenarios. To support model development, 21-channel EEG signals were measured on 25 healthy subjects, and sets of features were extracted from the time, time-frequency, frequency and nonlinear domains. To select the best use of the available features, automatic selection was performed by random-forest-based algorithms. The k-nearest neighbor, support vector machine with radial kernel, naïve Bayes, and multilayer perceptron algorithms were applied for the classification. By using EEG signals obtained while contemplating becoming an insider threat, the subject-wise model identified malicious intentions with 78.57% accuracy. The model also distinguished insider threat scenarios from everyday conflict scenarios with 93.47% accuracy. These findings could be utilized to support the development of insider threat mitigation systems along with existing trustworthiness assessments in the nuclear industry.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographySignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsBayes TheoremHumansNuclear Power PlantsSupport Vector MachineTerrorismelectroencephalographyimplicit intentioninsider threatmachine learningnuclear securitysubject-wise classification

Identifiers

PMID33171609
PMCPMC7664688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.