Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33171524›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastroenterology and hepatology2021

Clinical importance of muscle volume in lenvatinib treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma: Analysis adjusted with inverse probability weighting.

Atsushi Hiraoka, Takashi Kumada, Kazuya Kariyama, Toshifumi Tada, Joji Tani, Shinya Fukunishi, Masanori Atsukawa, Masashi Hirooka, Kunihiko Tsuji, Toru Ishikawa and 24 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors at 19 institutions in 1 country.

Atsushi HiraokaGastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1989-0480
Takashi KumadaDepartment of Nursing, Gifu Kyoritsu University, Ogaki, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2211-495X
Kazuya KariyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Okayama City Hospital, Okayama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3996-7502
Toshifumi TadaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Himeji Red Cross Hospital, Himeji, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0976-6761
Joji TaniDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kagawa University, Takamatsu, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8801-2505
Shinya FukunishiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan.
Masanori AtsukawaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3374-7111
Masashi HirookaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.
Kunihiko TsujiCenter of Gastroenterology, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Toru IshikawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Saiseikai Niigata Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Koichi TakaguchiDepartment of Hepatology, Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Takamatsu, Japan.
Ei ItobayashiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asahi General Hospital, Asahi, Japan.
Kazuto TajiriDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toyama University Hospital, Toyama, Japan.
Noritomo ShimadaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Otakanomori Hospital, Kashiwa, Japan.
Hiroshi ShibataDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tokushima Prefectural Central Hospital, Tokushima, Japan.
Hironori OchiHepato-biliary Center, Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan.
Kazuhito KawataDepartment of Hepatology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Satoshi YasudaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Gifu, Japan.
Hidenori ToyodaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Gifu, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1652-6168
Hideko OhamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuhiro NousoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Okayama City Hospital, Okayama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2018-0008
Akemi TsutsuiDepartment of Hepatology, Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Takamatsu, Japan.
Takuya NaganoDepartment of Hepatology, Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Takamatsu, Japan.
Norio ItokawaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Korenobu HayamaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Taeang AraiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Michitaka ImaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Saiseikai Niigata Hospital, Niigata, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6448-6036
Yohei KoizumiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.
Shinichiro NakamuraDepartment of Internal Medicine, Himeji Red Cross Hospital, Himeji, Japan.
Kouji JokoHepato-biliary Center, Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8111-3266
Kojiro MichitakaGastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan.
Yoichi HiasaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4117-339X
Masatoshi KudoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan.
Real-life Practice Experts for HCC (RELPEC) Study Group and HCC 48 Group (hepatocellular carcinoma experts from 48 clinics in Japan)
Nippon Medical School · JPEhime University · JPKagawa Prefectural Central Hospital · JPEhime Prefectural Central Hospital · JPHimeji Red Cross Hospital · JPMatsuyama Red Cross Hospital · JPOgaki Municipal Hospital · JPOkayama Prefecture · JPOsaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University · JPSaiseikai Niigata Daini Hospital · JPAsahi General Hospital · JPGifu Kyoritsu University · JPHamamatsu University · JPKagawa University · JPKindai University Hospital · JPOtemae Hospital · JPTeine Keijinkai Hospital · JPTokushima Prefectural Central Hospital · JPToyama University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimThis study aimed to elucidate the clinical importance of muscle volume loss (pre-sarcopenia) in patients receiving lenvatinib as treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC).

methodsOf 437 u-HCC patients treated with lenvatinib at specific institutions in Japan between March 2018 and May 2020, 151 with available computed tomography imaging data from the time of lenvatinib introduction were enrolled. Pre-sarcopenia was diagnosed based on a previously reported cut-off value calculation formula [psoas muscle area at level of middle of third lumbar vertebra (cm

resultsCox hazard multivariate analysis showed alpha-fetoprotein (≥400 ng/mL) (hazard ratio [HR] 2.271, P < 0.001), Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage (C and D) (HR 1.625, P = 0.018), and positive for pre-sarcopenia (HR 1.652, P = 0.042) to be significant prognostic factors. OS rates for the pre-sarcopenia group (n = 41) were worse than those for the non-pre-sarcopenia group (n = 110) (0.5-, 1-, and 1.5-year OS: 72.5%, 27.9%, and 7.0% vs 80.7%, 56.7%, and 46.1%, respectively; P < 0.001), as was progression-free survival (P = 0.025). Time to stopping lenvatinib or disease progression was better in the non-pre-sarcopenia group (0.5-, 1-, and 1.5-year OS: 48.0%, 24.5%, and 8.4% vs 20.0%, 10.3%, and 4.2%, respectively; P < 0.001). Also, the frequency of the adverse event appetite loss (any grade) was greater in the pre-sarcopenia group (43.9% vs 18.2%, P = 0.003).

conclusionPre-sarcopenia was shown to be a significant prognostic factor in patients treated with lenvatinib for u-HCC.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, HepatocellularFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsMalePhenylurea CompoundsPrognosisPsoas MusclesQuinolinesRetrospective StudiesSarcopeniaSurvival AnalysisTomography, X-Ray ComputedAntineoplastic AgentslenvatinibPhenylurea CompoundsQuinolinesHepatocellular carcinomaLenvatinibPre-sarcopeniaPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID33171524
PMCPMC8359359
OpenAlexW3099576739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.