Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33171243›Full record

ArticleSeminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2021

Type A Aortic Dissection During COVID-19 Pandemic: Report From Tertiary Aortic Centers in the United States and China.

Shinichi Fukuhara, Hao Tang, Karen M Kim, Ling Tan, Kangjun Shen, Guobao Song, Tao Tang, Himanshu J Patel, Xiang Wei, Bo Yang

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Commentary: "How to Slay the Aortic Dissection Beast in a COVID-19 World".Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shinichi FukuharaDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Hao TangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China. Electronic address: dr.tanghao@csu.edu.cn.
Karen M KimDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Ling TanDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Kangjun ShenDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Guobao SongDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Tao TangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Himanshu J PatelDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Xiang WeiDivision of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. Electronic address: xiangwei@tjh.tjmu.edu.cn.
Bo YangDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: boya@med.umich.edu.
Central South University · CNUniversity of Michigan · USTongji Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has substantially disrupted many processes of care related to emergency cardiac conditions, while there has been no clinical guidance regarding the management of type A aortic dissection. A retrospective multicenter study involving 52 consecutive patients (mean age 52.3, 28.9% women) with type A aortic dissection during COVID-19 pandemic was conducted at tertiary aortic centers in Michigan, Wuhan and Changsha (China). Twenty-four (46.2%) were considered clinically suspicious for COVID-19 based on radiographic lung lesions (70.8%) followed by dyspnea (25.0%), cough (12.5%), and fever (12.5%). Overall, 47 (90.4%) underwent an operation and 5 (9.6%) managed nonoperatively. All suspected patients underwent a reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction at arrival, whereas 82.1% in the nonsuspected (P = 0.054). Among the 24 patients either nonoperatively managed or whose operation was delayed for >24 hours, only 1 (4.2%) died. A total of 3 (6.4%) operated patients had a positive reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction at various timings, including 1 nonsuspected patient preoperatively and 2 with very recent COVID-19 infection. The first patient died of respiratory failure despite uneventful surgical repair and maximal medical management. The postoperative course of both patients with recent COVID-19 was characterized by severe coagulopathy requiring massive transfusions and prolonged ICU stay. However, both survived to hospital discharge. In light of the possible dismal outcomes associated with dual diagnoses of type A aortic dissection/COVID-19 and the higher-than-expected number of asymptomatic carriers, all type A dissection patients should be immediately tested for COVID-19. Surgical interventions in patients recovered from recent COVID-19 may be safe.

Indexed as

Aortic DissectionCOVID-19ChinaFemaleHumansMaleMichiganMiddle AgedPandemicsRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2United StatesAcute respiratory distress syndromeAcute type A aortic dissectionCOVID-19

Identifiers

PMID33171243
PMCPMC7648657
OpenAlexW3096538064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.