Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33171178›Full record

SynthesisPreventive medicine2021

Cognitions and behaviours of general practitioners in France regarding HPV vaccination: A theory-based systematic review.

Géraldine Escriva-Boulley, Olena Mandrik, Marie Préau, Rolando Herrero, Patricia Villain

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Preventive medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. [Barriers to vaccination - parents' attitudes towards HPV vaccination].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Géraldine Escriva-BoulleyLaboratoire GRePS (EA 4163), Université Lyon 2, 69676 Bron, France.
Olena MandrikThe University of Sheffield, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Health Economic and Decision Science (HEDS), Sheffield S1 4DA, United Kingdom.
Marie PréauLaboratoire GRePS (EA 4163), Université Lyon 2, 69676 Bron, France.
Rolando HerreroAgencia Costarricense de Investigaciones, Biomédicas, San Jose, Costa Rica.
Patricia VillainScreening Group, Early Detection and Prevention Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization (IARC - WHO), 69372 Lyon, France. Electronic address: villainp@iarc.fr.
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre International de Recherche sur le Cancer · FRInstituto Costarricense de Investigación y Enseñanza en Nutrición y Salud · CRUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is safe and efficacious to prevent persistent HPV infection, precancerous anogenital lesions and cervical cancer. However, in countries where vaccination programmes are implemented outside of schools, such as France, reaching high HPV vaccination coverage of the target population is challenging. Many studies have been performed in France to assess cognitions of general practitioners (GPs) regarding HPV vaccination. However, the evidence is not consistent about which cognitions are key. To provide a comprehensive overview, we performed a systematic review of studies conducted in France on GPs' cognitions regarding HPV vaccination and used the reasoned action approach to extract and synthesize data. The systematic search was performed up to July 2020 in Medline via PubMed, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, Embase, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, Pascal and Francis databases. Grey literature was searched for in the French Public Health Database, Cairn. Info, yahoo.fr, and Google Scholar. Twenty-five scientific publications were selected based on eligibility criteria and assessed for quality. Our qualitative synthesis highlights that although 73% of GPs report recommending HPV vaccination, up to 50% would not recommend it because of concerns, including changes in patients' health behaviours and doubts about safety and/or efficacy. GPs' injunctive norms, i.e. trust in institutional information, were shown to be associated positively with GPs' willingness to recommend HPV vaccination. Parents' fears, girls' age, and potential connection with sexuality do not seem to affect GPs' recommendations. These results will inform the development of a professional educational intervention targeting GPs in France.

Indexed as

General PractitionersPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCognitionFemaleFranceHumansVaccinationPapillomavirus VaccinesFranceGeneral practitionersHPV vaccinationReasoned action approach

Identifiers

PMID33171178
PMCPMC7840585
OpenAlexW3094931409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.