Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33171014›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2021

Leech blood-meal invertebrate-derived DNA reveals differences in Bornean mammal diversity across habitats.

Rosie Drinkwater, Tommaso Jucker, Joshua H T Potter, Tom Swinfield, David A Coomes, Eleanor M Slade, M Thomas P Gilbert, Owen T Lewis, Henry Bernard, Matthew J Struebig and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bringing to light unnoticed data on the genetic and host diversity of ungulateInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Environmental DNA for biomonitoring.Molecular ecology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Rosie DrinkwaterSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6892-1664
Tommaso JuckerSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0751-6312
Joshua H T PotterSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3785-1656
Tom SwinfieldDepartment of Plant Sciences, Forest and Ecology Conservation Group, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9354-5090
David A CoomesDepartment of Plant Sciences, Forest and Ecology Conservation Group, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8261-2582
Eleanor M SladeDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6108-1196
M Thomas P GilbertDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5805-7195
Owen T LewisDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7935-6111
Henry BernardInstitute for Tropical Biology and Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Sabah, Malaysia.
Matthew J StruebigDurrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology (DICE), School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2058-8502
Elizabeth L ClareSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6563-3365
Stephen J RossiterSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3881-4515
Queen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBNanyang Technological University · SGUniversiti of Malaysia Sabah · MYUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Kent · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of metabarcoding to environmental and invertebrate-derived DNA (eDNA and iDNA) is a new and increasingly applied method for monitoring biodiversity across a diverse range of habitats. This approach is particularly promising for sampling in the biodiverse humid tropics, where rapid land-use change for agriculture means there is a growing need to understand the conservation value of the remaining mosaic and degraded landscapes. Here we use iDNA from blood-feeding leeches (Haemadipsa picta) to assess differences in mammalian diversity across a gradient of forest degradation in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo. We screened 557 individual leeches for mammal DNA by targeting fragments of the 16S rRNA gene and detected 14 mammalian genera. We recorded lower mammal diversity in the most heavily degraded forest compared to higher quality twice logged forest. Although the accumulation curves of diversity estimates were comparable across these habitat types, diversity was higher in twice logged forest, with more taxa of conservation concern. In addition, our analysis revealed differences between the community recorded in the heavily logged forest and that of the twice logged forest. By revealing differences in mammal diversity across a human-modified tropical landscape, our study demonstrates the value of iDNA as a noninvasive biomonitoring approach in conservation assessments.

Indexed as

EcosystemLeechesAnimalsBiodiversityBorneoConservation of Natural ResourcesDNAForestsHumansMalaysiaMammalsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNARNA, Ribosomal, 16SbiodiversityBorneoHaemadipsidaeinvertebrate-derived DNAland-use changemolecular biomonitoring

Identifiers

PMID33171014
PMCPMC8359290
OpenAlexW3098489170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.