ArticlePloS one2020
Dynamic hyperinflation induced by the 6-minute pegboard and ring test in hospitalized patients with exacerbated COPD.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance-based outcome measures to assess functionality in hospitalised patients with COPD exacerbations: a systematic review of the measurement properties.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe six-minute pegboard and ring test (6-PBRT) has been used to evaluate functional capacity of the upper limbs in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have evaluated dynamic hyperinflation (DH) during exercise with upper limbs in the hospital setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate physiological responses and DH induced by 6-PBRT in hospitalized patients with acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD).
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary hospital enrolling patients who were hospitalized due to AECOPD. All included participants underwent an evaluation of lung function and 6-PBRT when they reached minimum clinical criteria. Ventilatory and hemodynamics parameters were monitored during 6-PBRT and until 6 minutes of rest after the test. Symptoms of dyspnea and upper limb fatigue were also measured.
resultsEighteen patients (71.3±5.1 years) with a mean FEV1 of 43.2±18.3% were included in the study (11 females). Prevalence of DH after 6-PBRT was 50% (considering the drop of 150 ml or 10% of inspiratory capacity, immediately after the end of the test). There was a significant increase in respiratory rate, minute volume, dyspnea, and upper limb fatigue after the end of 6-PBRT (p<0.05). Dyspnea recovered more precociously than the perception of fatigue, being reestablished within four minutes of rest. An increase in heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressures was also induced by 6-PBRT (p<0.05), requiring 6 minutes of recovery to return to baseline. No adverse events were observed during 6-PBRT. We concluded that 6-PBRT induces physiological changes during its execution, at safe levels, requiring a maximum of 6 minutes for recovery. Finally, the test proved to be safe and applicable for patients hospitalized due to AECOPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.