Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33170861›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Stimbiotic supplementation improved performance and reduced inflammatory response via stimulating fiber fermenting microbiome in weaner pigs housed in a poor sanitary environment and fed an antibiotic-free low zinc oxide diet.

Hyun Min Cho, Gemma González-Ortiz, Diego Melo-Durán, Jung Min Heo, Gustavo Cordero, Michael R Bedford, Jae Cheol Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Novel primers to identify a wider diversity of butyrate-producing bacteria.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Hyun Min ChoDepartment of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea.
Gemma González-OrtizAB Vista, Marlborough, Wiltshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4181-5524
Diego Melo-DuránDepartament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Servei de Nutrició i Benestar Animal (SNiBA), Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
Jung Min HeoDepartment of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea.
Gustavo CorderoAB Vista, Marlborough, Wiltshire, United Kingdom.
Michael R BedfordAB Vista, Marlborough, Wiltshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5308-4290
Jae Cheol KimAB Vista, Marlborough, Wiltshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8215-4051
AB Vista (United Kingdom) · GBChungnam National University · KRUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated whether the inclusion of a stimbiotic (STB) can improve performance, influence intestinal microbiota and fermentation activity, and reduce pro-inflammatory cytokines in piglets fed a low zinc oxide diet without antimicrobial growth promotors compared to fructo-oligosaccharide (FOS) and mannan-oligosaccharide (MOS) when housed either in good sanitary (GS) or poor sanitary (PS) environments. One hundred forty-four male pigs (28-day-old) were sorted by initial body weight (BW) and allocated to one of six experimental treatments: 1) GS environment without any additive (GS-CTR); 2) GS environment with 0.01% stimbiotic (GS-STB); 3) PS environment (without cleaning and disinfection of a previously populated room) without any additive (PS-CTR); 4) PS environment with 0.01% STB (PS-STB); 5) PS environment with 0.1% MOS (PS-MOS); and 6) PS environment with 0.2% FOS (PS-FOS). Each treatment had six replicates, with four animals each. Three feeding phases, based on corn, wheat, and soybean meal were available ad libitum for the 42-days of the study. Housing piglets under PS conditions negatively influenced performance, increased plasma tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), affected the fecal microbial populations and increased concentrations of branched-chain fatty acids (BCFA) compared to GS. Stimbiotic improved 42-d-BW under PS conditions (P < 0.05) whereas MOS or FOS had no effect. On d35, plasma TNF-α was reduced with STB in PS (P < 0.05). The ratio between VFA:BCFA increased (P < 0.05) with STB, MOS or FOS in PS, and under GS condition, STB also increased the ratio. Stimbiotic increased the proportion of Clostridiales Family XIII Incertae Sedis and Clostridiaceae, while MOS and FOS increased Selenomonadaceae, Catabacteriaceae and Fibrobacteraceae. These results indicate that STB shifted the intestinal microbiome to favor fiber fermentation which likely contributed to reduced inflammatory response and improved performance, particularly in piglets reared in PS conditions.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriaBody WeightCytokinesDietary FiberDietary SupplementsEndotoxinsFermentationGene Expression RegulationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHousing, AnimalInflammationMaleMannansOligosaccharidesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SCytokinesDietary FiberEndotoxinsfructooligosaccharideMannansOligosaccharidesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SZinc Oxide

Identifiers

PMID33170861
PMCPMC7654836
OpenAlexW3105451747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.