Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33170650›Full record

ArticleACS nano2020

Analytical Model for Particle Capture in Nanopores Elucidates Competition among Electrophoresis, Electroosmosis, and Dielectrophoresis.

Mauro Chinappi, Misa Yamaji, Ryuji Kawano, Fabio Cecconi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nano, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Electrokinetic nanoparticle transport in an interconnected porous environment: Decoupling cavity escape and directional bias.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mauro ChinappiDipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Via del Politecnico 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4509-1247
Misa YamajiDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo 184-8588, Japan.
Ryuji KawanoDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo 184-8588, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6523-0649
Fabio CecconiCNR-Istituto dei Sistemi Complessi, Via dei Taurini 19, I-00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8351-248X
Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology · JPInstitute for Complex Systems · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interaction between nanoparticles dispersed in a fluid and nanopores is governed by the interplay of hydrodynamical, electrical, and chemical effects. We developed a theory for particle capture in nanopores and derived analytical expressions for the capture rate under the concurrent action of electrical forces, fluid advection, and Brownian motion. Our approach naturally splits the average capture time in two terms, an

Indexed as

capture processdielectrophoretic captureelectrohydrodynamicsgeneralized Smoluchowski modelnanoporesprotein sensingα-hemolysin

Identifiers

PMID33170650
PMCPMC8016366
OpenAlexW3105988693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.