ArticleInternational journal of hematology2021
Meropenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam for febrile neutropenia in pediatric patients: efficacy of piperacillin/tazobactam as a 1-h drip infusion four times a day.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of 2-hour drip infusions of meropenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam for febrile neutropenia in pediatric patients.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025Trial
- The effect of meropenem versus piperacillin-tazobactam in critically ill patients with sepsis and septic shock.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Diagnosis and Management of Febrile Neutropenia in Pediatric Oncology Patients-A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Neonatal Sepsis in a Resource-Limited Setting: Causative Microorganisms and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profile.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although survival of children with hematological diseases and cancer has increased dramatically, febrile neutropenia (FN) is a frequently observed complication and is sometimes life-threatening in pediatric cancer patients. A prospective, randomized study was performed to clarify the usefulness of meropenem (MEPM) and piperacillin/tazobactam (PIPC/TAZ) for pediatric patients with FN. Ninety-nine patients with 394 episodes were randomly assigned to receive MEPM or PIPC/TAZ. MEPM was administered at 120 mg/kg/day as a 1-h drip infusion 3 times a day. On the other hand, PIPC/TAZ was administered at 360 mg/kg/day as a 1-h drip infusion 4 times a day. MEPM was effective in 69.5% of the 200 episodes, and PIPC/TAZ was effective in 77.2% of the 193 episodes. Compared with our previous study of MEPM 120 mg/kg/day as a 1-h drip infusion 3 times a day versus PIPC/TAZ 337.5 mg/kg/day as a 1-h drip infusion 3 times a day, the success rate of the MEPM group was not different. However, the success rate of the PIPC/TAZ group was higher than in the previous study (p = 0.001). In particular, the success rate in patients ≥ 15 years of age was improved in the PIPC/TAZ group of the present study compared with the previous study (p = 0.005).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.