Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33170410›Full record

ArticleApplied psychophysiology and biofeedback2021

RZ Interval as an Impedance Cardiography Indicator of Effort-Related Cardiac Sympathetic Activity.

Paul J Silvia, Ashley N McHone, Zuzana Mironovová, Kari M Eddington, Kelly L Harper, Sarah H Sperry, Thomas R Kwapil

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Paul J SilviaDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, P.O. Box 26170, Greensboro, NC, 27402-6170, USA. p_silvia@uncg.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4597-328X
Ashley N McHoneDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, P.O. Box 26170, Greensboro, NC, 27402-6170, USA.
Zuzana MironovováDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, P.O. Box 26170, Greensboro, NC, 27402-6170, USA.
Kari M EddingtonDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, P.O. Box 26170, Greensboro, NC, 27402-6170, USA.
Kelly L HarperBehavioral Science Division, VA Boston Healthcare System, National Center for PTSD, Boston, USA.
Sarah H SperryDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, USA.
Thomas R KwapilDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, USA.
University of North Carolina at Greensboro · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USVA Boston Healthcare System · US

Funding

Self-focused attention, self-evaluation, and effortR15MH079374 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA GREENSBORO · PI SILVIA, PAUL JOSEPH · 2010 to 2014
$641k
NIMH NIH HHS R15 MH079374
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on effort and motivation commonly assesses how the sympathetic branch of the autonomic nervous system affects the cardiovascular system. The cardiac pre-ejection period (PEP), assessed via impedance cardiography, is a common outcome, but assessing PEP requires identifying subtle points on cardiac waveforms. The present research examined the psychometric value of the RZ interval (RZ), which has recently been proposed as an indicator of sympathetic activity, for effort research. Also known as the initial systolic time interval (ISTI), RZ is the time (in ms) between the ECG R peak and the dZ/dt Z peak. Unlike PEP, RZ involves salient waveform points that are easily and reliably identified. Data from two experiments evaluated the suitability of RZ for effort paradigms and compared it to a popular automated PEP method. In Studies 1 (n = 89) and 2 (n = 71), participants completed a standard appetitive task in which each correct response earned a small amount of cash. As expected, incentives significantly affected PEP and RZ in both experiments. PEP and RZ were highly correlated (all rs ≥ 0.89), and RZ consistently yielded a larger effect size than PEP. In Study 3, a quantitative synthesis of the experiments indicated that the effect size of RZ's response to incentives (Hedges's g = 0.432 [0.310, 0.554]) was roughly 15% larger than PEP's effect size (g = 0.376 [0.256, 0.496]). RZ thus appears promising for future research on sympathetic aspects of effort-related cardiac activity.

Indexed as

Cardiography, ImpedanceMotivationAdultAutonomic Nervous SystemElectrocardiographyFemaleHeartHumansSystoleYoung AdultEffortImpedance cardiographyInitial systolic time intervalMotivationPre-ejection periodRZ

Identifiers

PMID33170410
PMCPMC7880868
OpenAlexW3105123536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.