Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33170396›Full record

ReviewBrain informatics2020

Neuropsychopharmacological effects of midazolam on the human brain.

Junkai Wang, Pei Sun, Peipeng Liang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Local and global effects of sedation in resting-state fMRI: a randomized, placebo-controlled comparison between etifoxine and alprazolam.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The Risk of Dementia after Anesthesia Differs according to the Mode of Anesthesia and Individual Anesthetic Agent.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Junkai WangSchool of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Haidian District, Beijing, 100048, China.
Pei SunDepartment of Psychology, Tsinghua University, Haidian District, Beijing, 100084, China. peisun@tsinghua.edu.cn.
Peipeng LiangSchool of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Haidian District, Beijing, 100048, China. ppliang@cnu.edu.cn.
Capital Normal University · CNTsinghua University · CN

Funding

Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Project of Brain cognition and brain medicine Z171100000117001Beijing Nova Program 2016000021223TD07Capacity Building for Sci-Tech Innovation - Fundamental Scientific Research Funds 19530050157Capacity Building for Sci-Tech Innovation - Fundamental Scientific Research Funds 19530050184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a commonly used anesthetic agent, midazolam has the properties of water-soluble, rapid onset, and short duration of action. With the rapid development in the field of neuroimaging, numerous studies have investigated how midazolam acts on the human brain to induce the alteration of consciousness. However, the neural bases of midazolam-induced sedation or anesthesia remain beginning to be understood in detail. In this review, we summarize findings from neuroimaging studies that have used midazolam to study altered consciousness at different levels and content. We also compare the results to those of neuroimaging studies using diverse anesthetic agents and describe the common neural correlates of anesthetic-induced alteration of consciousness.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaConsciousnessFunctional imagingMidazolamSedation

Identifiers

PMID33170396
PMCPMC7655878
OpenAlexW3106325681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.