Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33170331›Full record

ReviewIntensive care medicine2020

Analgesia and sedation in patients with ARDS.

Gerald Chanques, Jean-Michel Constantin, John W Devlin, E Wesley Ely, Gilles L Fraser, Céline Gélinas, Timothy D Girard, Claude Guérin, Matthieu Jabaudon, Samir Jaber and 12 more

6 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Intensive care medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 6 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 118 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
118citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
24.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05027217 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Sedation, ANalgesia and Delirium MANagement: a Study of Medical, Surgical, Trauma, and Neuro-intensive Care Patients and a COVID-19 Sub-study.

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2022 to 2023Enrolled3,421ConditionsCritical Illness, Sedation Complication, Intensive Care Unit Delirium, AnalgesiaArmsNo intervention
NCT05312385 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Open Label, Assessor-Blinded Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Isoflurane Delivered Via the Sedaconda ACD-S Compared to Intravenous Propofol for Sedation of Mechanically Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Adult Patients (INSPiRE-ICU1)

TypeinterventionalSponsorSedana MedicalRan2022 to 2024Enrolled277ConditionsSedationArmsIsoflurane, Propofol, Isoflurane (run-ins)
NCT05327296 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Open Label, Assessor-Blinded Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Isoflurane Delivered Via the Sedaconda ACD-S Compared to Intravenous Propofol for Sedation of Mechanically Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Adult Patients (INSPiRE-ICU2)

TypeinterventionalSponsorSedana MedicalRan2022 to 2024Enrolled282ConditionsSedationArmsIsoflurane, Propofol
NCT06203405 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Efficacy of P0.1-guided Sedation Protocol in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSiriraj HospitalRan2023 to 2026Enrolled214ConditionsRespiratory Failure, Critical Illness, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult, Lung InjuryArmsTitrating sedation targeting both optimal P0.1 and appropriate arousal level, Fentanyl, Midazolam, Propofol, Dexmedetomidine
NCT06809218 phase3active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

INSPiRE-ICU 1 & 2: A Pooled Analysis of Long-Term Outcomes at 3 and 6 Months After Inhaled Isoflurane Delivered Via the Sedaconda ACD-S Compared to Intravenous Propofol for Sedation of Mechanically Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Adult Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorSedana MedicalRan2022 to 2025Enrolled312ConditionsPost-Intensive Care Syndrome, SedationArmsInhaled isoflurane administered by Sedaconda ACD-S, Intravenous infusion of propofol
NCT06991777 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility Study: Precision Sedation in Intensive Care Using Neurophysiologic and Respiratory Targets.

TypeinterventionalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2024 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsCritical IllnessArmsPrecision sedation in intensive care using neurophysiologic and respiratory targets.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

118 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 322 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

58 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 19 institutions in 6 countries.

Gerald ChanquesDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Saint Eloi Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France. g-chanques@chu-montpellier.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7851-8609
Jean-Michel ConstantinDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Sorbonne University, GRC 29, AP-HP, DMU DREAM, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
John W DevlinDepartment of Pharmacy and Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, School of Pharmacy, Northeastern University, Brigham, USA.
E Wesley ElyCenter for Critical Illness, Brain Dysfunction, and Survivorship (CIBS), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Gilles L FraserTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Céline GélinasIngram School of Nursing, McGill University and Centre for Nursing Research/Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, CIUSSS Centre-West-Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Timothy D GirardClinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Claude GuérinMedecine Intensive-Réanimation, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, and University of Lyon, Lyon, France.
Matthieu JabaudonDepartment of Perioperative Medicine, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, GReD, CNRS, INSERM, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Samir JaberDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Saint Eloi Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France.
Sangeeta MehtaDepartment of Medicine, Sinai Health, Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Thomas LangerDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milano - Bicocca, Italy.
Michael J MurrayCV ICU, Banner-University Arizona, University Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Pratik PandharipandeDepartment of Anesthesiology and the Critical Illness, Brain Dysfunction, and Survivorship (CIBS) Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Bhakti PatelDepartment of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jean-François PayenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, and Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences, INSERM U1216, Grenoble, France.
Kathleen PuntilloSchool of Nursing, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Bram RochwergDepartment of Medicine and Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Yahya ShehabiSchool of Clinical Sciences, Monash University and Monash Health, Clayton, Australia.
Thomas StrømDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark.
Hanne Tanghus OlsenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark.
John P KressDepartment of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of Chicago · USAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · ITBrigham and Women's Hospital · USGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center · USImpact · CAInserm · FRJewish General Hospital · CAOdense University Hospital · DKSorbonne Université · FRTufts University · USUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKUniversity of Toronto · CAUNSW Sydney · AUVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is one of the most demanding conditions in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Management of analgesia and sedation in ARDS is particularly challenging. An expert panel was convened to produce a "state-of-the-art" article to support clinicians in the optimal management of analgesia/sedation in mechanically ventilated adults with ARDS, including those with COVID-19. Current ICU analgesia/sedation guidelines promote analgesia first and minimization of sedation, wakefulness, delirium prevention and early rehabilitation to facilitate ventilator and ICU liberation. However, these strategies cannot always be applied to patients with ARDS who sometimes require deep sedation and/or paralysis. Patients with severe ARDS may be under-represented in analgesia/sedation studies and currently recommended strategies may not be feasible. With lightened sedation, distress-related symptoms (e.g., pain and discomfort, anxiety, dyspnea) and patient-ventilator asynchrony should be systematically assessed and managed through interprofessional collaboration, prioritizing analgesia and anxiolysis. Adaptation of ventilator settings (e.g., use of a pressure-set mode, spontaneous breathing, sensitive inspiratory trigger) should be systematically considered before additional medications are administered. Managing the mechanical ventilator is of paramount importance to avoid the unnecessary use of deep sedation and/or paralysis. Therefore, applying an "ABCDEF-R" bundle (R = Respiratory-drive-control) may be beneficial in ARDS patients. Further studies are needed, especially regarding the use and long-term effects of fast-offset drugs (e.g., remifentanil, volatile anesthetics) and the electrophysiological assessment of analgesia/sedation (e.g., electroencephalogram devices, heart-rate variability, and video pupillometry). This review is particularly relevant during the COVID-19 pandemic given drug shortages and limited ICU-bed capacity.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaGuidelines as TopicHumansHypnotics and SedativesPain ManagementRespiratory Distress SyndromeHypnotics and SedativesAcute respiratory distress syndromeAnalgesiaCOVID-19Intensive care unitMechanical ventilationRehabilitationSedation

Identifiers

PMID33170331
PMCPMC7653978
OpenAlexW3099389154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.