Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33170321›Full record

Trial reportCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2021

Clinical utility of circulating tumor-associated cells to predict and monitor chemo-response in solid tumors.

Timothy Crook, Andrew Gaya, Raymond Page, Sewanti Limaye, Anantbhushan Ranade, Amit Bhatt, Sanket Patil, Prashant Kumar, Darshana Patil, Dadasaheb Akolkar

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Timothy CrookDepartment of Oncology, Broomsfield Hospital, Chelmsford, UK.
Andrew GayaHCA Healthcare UK, London, W1G 6AF, UK.
Raymond PageWorcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, USA.
Sewanti LimayeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kokilaben Dhirubai Ambani Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Anantbhushan RanadeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Avinash Cancer Clinic, Pune, India.
Amit BhattDepartment of Medical Oncology, Avinash Cancer Clinic, Pune, India.
Sanket PatilDatar Cancer Genetics, F-8 D-Road, Ambad, Nasik, 422010, India.
Prashant KumarDatar Cancer Genetics, F-8 D-Road, Ambad, Nasik, 422010, India.
Darshana PatilDatar Cancer Genetics, F-8 D-Road, Ambad, Nasik, 422010, India.
Dadasaheb AkolkarDatar Cancer Genetics, F-8 D-Road, Ambad, Nasik, 422010, India. dadasaheb.akolkar@datarpgx.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4434-488X
Datar Cancer Genetics (India) · INBroomfield Hospital · GBInforma Healthcare · GBKokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital · INManipal Academy of Higher Education · INWorcester Polytechnic Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSelection of cytotoxic chemotherapy agents (CCA) based on pre-treatment evaluation of drug sensitivities is a desirable but unmet goal for personalized anticancer treatment strategies. Prior attempts to correlate in vitro Chemo-Response Profiles (CRP) of tumor explants or Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) with clinical outcomes have been largely unsuccessful.

methodsWe present results from a large cohort (n = 5090, three Arms) of patients with various solid organ tumors, where CRP of Circulating Tumor-Associated Cells (C-TACs) was determined against cancer-specific CCA panels to generate a database of 56,466 unique CRP.

resultsIn Arm 1 (n = 230), 93.7% concordance was observed between CRP of C-TACs and concurrently obtained Tumor tissue Derived Cells (TDCs). In arm 2 (n = 2201, pretreated), resistance of C-TACs to ≥ 1 CCA was observed in 79% of cases. In a blinded subset analysis of 143 pretreated patients with radiologically ascertained disease progression, CRP of C-TACs was 87% concordant with in vivo treatment failure. In Arm 3 (n = 2734, therapy naïve), innate resistance of C-TACs to ≥ 1 CCA was observed in 61% of cases. In a blinded subset analysis of 77 therapy naïve patients, in vitro chemo-sensitivity of C-TACs was concordant with radiologically ascertained treatment response to first line CCA in 97% of cases.

conclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first expansive and in-depth study demonstrating that real-time CRP of C-TACs is a viable approach for non-invasive assessment of response to CCA in solid organ cancers.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualDisease ProgressionDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingProspective StudiesAntineoplastic AgentsChemotherapyCirculating tumor-associated cells: C-TACsIn vitro chemoresponse profiling: CRPNon-invasive liquid biopsyPrecision oncologySurveillance

Identifiers

PMID33170321
PMCPMC7870597
OpenAlexW3105841477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.