Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33170283›Full record

ArticleJournal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)2020

A Coincident Thinning Index for Keratoconus Identification Using OCT Pachymetry and Epithelial Thickness Maps.

Elias Pavlatos, Shihao Chen, Yuli Yang, Qinmei Wang, David Huang, Yan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Artificial intelligence for detecting keratoconus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elias Pavlatos
Shihao Chen
Yuli Yang
Qinmei Wang
David Huang
Yan Li

Funding

Proteomics CoreP30EY010572 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Kate E Keller · 1995 to 2026
$19.4M
Optical Coherence Tomography-Aided Differential Diagnosis and Treatment of Irregular CorneasR01EY029023 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Yan Li · 2018 to 2026
$3.0M
Applications of ultrahigh-speed long-range wide-field OCT in anterior eye diseasesR01EY028755 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HUANG, DAVID · 2018 to 2022
$2.5M
Translational Vision Science Research at Oregon Health & Science UniversityT32EY023211 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Yali Jia, Kate E Keller · 2013 to 2026
$2.4M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY010572NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028755NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029023NEI NIH HHS T32 EY023211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop a coincident thinning (CTN) index to differentiate between keratoconic and healthy corneas using optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements of pachymetry and epithelial thickness.

methodsPattern deviation maps of pachymetry and epithelial thickness were generated using Fourier-domain OCT images of the cornea. The co-localized thinning of the two maps was quantified using a novel CTN index, which was calculated from Gaussian fits of the regions of maximum relative thinning. The CTN index was validated using k-fold cross-validation, and its classification performance was compared to minimum pachymetry and maximum keratometry.

resultsA total of 82 normal eyes and 133 eyes within three groups of keratoconus severity were evaluated. The pattern deviation maps for the keratoconic eyes showed relative thinning that was larger in magnitude and more strongly correlated with the Gaussian function compared to normal eyes (all P < .01). The distance between the pachymetric and epithelial maximum relative thinning locations was significantly smaller for the keratoconic eyes than for the normal eyes (all P < .02). The CTN index was significantly larger for all three keratoconus groups compared to normal eyes (all P < .0001). The CTN index demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% in detecting manifest keratoconus, 100% for subclinical keratoconus, and 56% for forme fruste keratoconus. The overall classification accuracy was better for the CTN index (93%) than for minimum pachymetry (86%) and maximum keratometry (86%).

conclusionsThe CTN index is a highly sensitive measure of coincident pachymetric and epithelial thinning. It provides valuable information for detecting and monitoring early to moderate keratoconus. [J Refract Surg. 2020;36(11):757-765.].

Indexed as

KeratoconusTomography, Optical CoherenceCorneaCorneal PachymetryCorneal TopographyCross-Sectional StudiesHumansROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID33170283
PMCPMC8629024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.