ArticleJAMA2020
Preprint Servers' Policies, Submission Requirements, and Transparency in Reporting and Research Integrity Recommendations.
Article in JAMA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Long-term cancer risk in historic cohorts of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review.Spine deformity · 2026Pooled it
- The present and future of peer review: Ideas, interventions, and evidence.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- An international, cross-sectional survey of preprint attitudes among biomedical researchers.F1000Research · 2024Article
- Grand challenge in biosafety and biosecurity.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Peer Review in a General Medical Research Journal Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: recommendations from the RISRS report.Research integrity and peer review · 2022Article
- Publishing Identifiable Patient Photographs in Scientific Journals: Scoping Review of Policies and Practices.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Biosecurity in an age of open science.PLoS biology · 2022Article
- Using preprints in evidence synthesis: Commentary on experience during the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2021Article
- Analysis of single comments left for bioRxiv preprints till September 2019.Biochemia medica · 2021Review
- Delays in reporting and publishing trial results during pandemics: cross sectional analysis of 2009 H1N1, 2014 Ebola, and 2016 Zika clinical trials.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Article
- Attitudes and practices of open data, preprinting, and peer-review-A cross sectional study on Croatian scientists.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.