Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33170131›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2020

The Impact of a Smartphone App on the Quality of Pediatric Colonoscopy Preparations: Randomized Controlled Trial.

James Brief, Anupama Chawla, Diana Lerner, Bernadette Vitola, Robert Woroniecki, Jeffrey Morganstern

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04590105 (The Impact of a Smartphone App on the Quality of Pediatric Colonoscopy Preparations), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04590105 nacompletednot on this map

The Impact of a Smartphone App on the Quality of Pediatric Colonoscopy Preparations

TypeinterventionalSponsorStony Brook UniversityRan2014 to 2015Enrolled42ConditionsPediatric ALLArmsSmartphone App "SB Colonoscopy Prep", Written Instruction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bowel Preparation for Pediatric Colonoscopy.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James Brief *Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Stony Brook Children's Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0330-6358
Anupama Chawla *Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Stony Brook Children's Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9960-540X
Diana Lerner *Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5459-0654
Bernadette Vitola *Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6438-2648
Robert Woroniecki *Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Stony Brook Children's Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5578-4514
Jeffrey Morganstern *Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Stony Brook Children's Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6590-6597
Stony Brook Children's Hospital · USMedical College of Wisconsin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmartphone apps have been successfully used to help adults prepare for colonoscopies. However, no study to date has investigated the effect of a smartphone app on pediatric colonoscopy preparation.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to determine if an app (SB Colonoscopy Prep) designed to educate and guide patients through their colonoscopy preparation will yield benefits over paper-based instructions and information.

methodsIn total, 46 patients aged 5-18 years received either app-based or written material with instructions on how to take their prep medications as well as information about the colonoscopy procedure. Prep quality, the number of calls to the gastroenterology service, and patient arrival time were recorded. After the procedure, a questionnaire was given to each patient through which they graded their knowledge of the procedure both before and after receiving the app or written material.

resultsApp users had higher mean Boston scores versus control subjects receiving written instructions (7.2 vs 5.9, P=.02), indicating better colonoscopy preps. In total, 75% (15/20) of app users and 41% (9/22) of written instruction users had preps categorized as "excellent" on the Boston scale. We found no significant differences in knowledge about the procedure (app users: 10/20 [50%], written instruction users 8/22 [36%]; P=.37), phone calls to the gastroenterology clinic (n=6 vs n=2; P=.27), or arrival times at the endoscopy suite (44 min vs 46 min before the scheduled procedure time; P=.56).

conclusionsSmartphone app use was associated with an increased number of colonoscopy preps classified as "excellent" on the Boston scale. There was no significant difference between app users and the control group regarding the number of calls to the gastroenterology clinic, patient arrival time, or patient knowledge about the procedure.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04590105; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04590105.

Indexed as

appcolonoscopymHealthmobile phonepediatricsprepsmartphone

Identifiers

PMID33170131
PMCPMC7685924
OpenAlexW3033452193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.