Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33169946›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2020

A retrospective analysis of bipolar depression treated with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Eric L Goldwaser, Kathy Daddario, Scott T Aaronson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04998097 (Changes in Serum miRNA and BDNF Levels in Bipolar II Depression Treated by Theta-burst Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04998097 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Changes in Serum miRNA and BDNF Levels in Bipolar II Depression Treated by Theta-burst Stimulation: A Randomized Sham-controlled Exploratory Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorKaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.Ran2022 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsBipolar II Disorder, Most Recent Episode Major DepressiveArmsrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eric L GoldwaserDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Maryland Medical Center and Sheppard Pratt Health System, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9676-9230
Kathy DaddarioClinical Research, Sheppard Pratt Health System, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Scott T AaronsonClinical Research, Sheppard Pratt Health System, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7616-8801
Sheppard Pratt Health System · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Philanthropic funds to Sheppard Pratt Health System
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTreatment options are limited for patients with bipolar depression. Antidepressants added to mood stabilizers even carry risks of precipitating mixed/manic episodes. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) may provide a safe and effective option for these patients.

methodsDatabase analysis of the TMS Service at Sheppard Pratt Health System identified patients with bipolar disorder type I (BD1) or II (BD2) in a pure depressive phase at initiation of TMS. Records were reviewed for response and remission rates based on MADRS scores, time to effect, and adverse events, notably treatment-emergent affective switching. All had failed at least two prior treatments for depression, were currently on at least one mood stabilizer and off antidepressants. Stimulation parameters targeted left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: 120% motor threshold, 10 pulses per second (pps) × 4s, intertrain interval (ITI) 26s, 75 trains (37.5 min/session) for 3,000 pps total, 5 sessions/week for 30 total treatments, or until remission criteria were met.

resultsA total of 44 patients with BD were identified, representing 15% of the total TMS population. 77% of those who completed a course of TMS met response criteria, and 41% of subjects who completed at least 25 treatments met remission criteria. Subjects with BD1 were more likely to respond, remit, or suffer an adverse event than those with BD2. No patient met clinical criteria for a manic/mixed episode, but four (10%) discontinued due to concerns of activation.

conclusionsTMS is effective in the bipolar depressed population where episode focused intervention can be specifically offered. Risk of psychomotor agitation must be closely monitored.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderHumansPrefrontal CortexRetrospective StudiesTranscranial Magnetic StimulationTreatment Outcomebipolar depressionbipolar disorderneuromodulationtranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID33169946
PMCPMC7749511
OpenAlexW3105555739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.