Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33169861›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of haematology2021

Machine-learning algorithms for predicting hospital re-admissions in sickle cell disease.

Arisha Patel, Kyra Gan, Andrew A Li, Jeremy Weiss, Mehdi Nouraie, Sridhar Tayur, Enrico M Novelli

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of haematology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Arisha PatelTepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Kyra GanOperations Research, Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5147-8747
Andrew A LiOperations Research, Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jeremy WeissHeinz College, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Mehdi NouraieDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7465-0581
Sridhar TayurOperations Management, Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Enrico M NovelliHeart, Lung and Blood Vascular Medicine Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3010-8285
Carnegie Mellon University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USZero to Three · US

Funding

Translational Pulmonary Vascular BiologyT32HL110849 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Sruti Shiva · 2012 to 2026
$5.0M
Neurovascular Determinants of Cognitive Function in Adults with Sickle Cell DiseaseR01HL127107 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI NOVELLI, ENRICO M · 2016 to 2020
$3.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL127107NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL110849NIH training grant 2T32HL110849-06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reducing preventable hospital re-admissions in Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) could potentially improve outcomes and decrease healthcare costs. In a retrospective study of electronic health records, we hypothesized Machine-Learning (ML) algorithms may outperform standard re-admission scoring systems (LACE and HOSPITAL indices). Participants (n = 446) included patients with SCD with at least one unplanned inpatient encounter between January 1, 2013, and November 1, 2018. Patients were randomly partitioned into training and testing groups. Unplanned hospital admissions (n = 3299) were stratified to training and testing samples. Potential predictors (n = 486), measured from the last unplanned inpatient discharge to the current unplanned inpatient visit, were obtained via both data-driven methods and clinical knowledge. Three standard ML algorithms, Logistic Regression (LR), Support-Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest (RF) were applied. Prediction performance was assessed using the C-statistic, sensitivity, and specificity. In addition, we reported the most important predictors in our best models. In this dataset, ML algorithms outperformed LACE [C-statistic 0·6, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0·57-0·64] and HOSPITAL (C-statistic 0·69, 95% CI 0·66-0·72), with the RF (C-statistic 0·77, 95% CI 0·73-0·79) and LR (C-statistic 0·77, 95% CI 0·73-0·8) performing the best. ML algorithms can be powerful tools in predicting re-admission in high-risk patient groups.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPatient ReadmissionAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsAnemia, Sickle CellFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentYoung Adult30-day unplanned hospital readmissionmachine learningpredictionretrospective studysickle cell disease

Identifiers

PMID33169861
PMCPMC11423862
OpenAlexW3099023999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.