Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33169792›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2021

How to Make a Rodent Giant: Genomic Basis and Tradeoffs of Gigantism in the Capybara, the World's Largest Rodent.

Santiago Herrera-Álvarez, Elinor Karlsson, Oliver A Ryder, Kerstin Lindblad-Toh, Andrew J Crawford

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. EBP-Colombia and the bioeconomy: Genomics in the service of biodiversity conservation and sustainable development.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Core Concept: Solving Peto's Paradox to better understand cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Santiago Herrera-ÁlvarezDepartment of Biological Sciences, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Elinor KarlssonBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Oliver A RyderSan Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research, San Diego Zoo Global, Escondido, CA, USA.
Kerstin Lindblad-TohBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Andrew J CrawfordDepartment of Biological Sciences, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Universidad de Los Andes · COSan Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USUppsala University · SE

Funding

The 200 mammals project: sequencing genomes by a novel cost-effective method, yielding a high resolution annotation of the human genome.R01HG008742 · NHGRI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI BIRREN, BRUCE W., KARLSSON, ELINOR · 2016 to 2020
$2.8M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG008742
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gigantism results when one lineage within a clade evolves extremely large body size relative to its small-bodied ancestors, a common phenomenon in animals. Theory predicts that the evolution of giants should be constrained by two tradeoffs. First, because body size is negatively correlated with population size, purifying selection is expected to be less efficient in species of large body size, leading to increased mutational load. Second, gigantism is achieved through generating a higher number of cells along with higher rates of cell proliferation, thus increasing the likelihood of cancer. To explore the genetic basis of gigantism in rodents and uncover genomic signatures of gigantism-related tradeoffs, we assembled a draft genome of the capybara (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris), the world's largest living rodent. We found that the genome-wide ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous mutations (ω) is elevated in the capybara relative to other rodents, likely caused by a generation-time effect and consistent with a nearly neutral model of molecular evolution. A genome-wide scan for adaptive protein evolution in the capybara highlighted several genes controlling postnatal bone growth regulation and musculoskeletal development, which are relevant to anatomical and developmental modifications for an increase in overall body size. Capybara-specific gene-family expansions included a putative novel anticancer adaptation that involves T-cell-mediated tumor suppression, offering a potential resolution to the increased cancer risk in this lineage. Our comparative genomic results uncovered the signature of an intragenomic conflict where the evolution of gigantism in the capybara involved selection on genes and pathways that are directly linked to cancer.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenomeAnimalsBody SizeFemaleGrowthMultigene FamilyNeoplasmsRodentiacancercapybaracomparative genomicsgigantism

Identifiers

PMID33169792
PMCPMC8097284
OpenAlexW3098487031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.