Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33169551›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of radiology2021

Volume and Mass Doubling Time of Lung Adenocarcinoma according to WHO Histologic Classification.

Jung Hee Hong, Samina Park, Hyungjin Kim, Jin Mo Goo, In Kyu Park, Chang Hyun Kang, Young Tae Kim, Soon Ho Yoon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Diagnostic Potential of Supplemental Static and DynamicJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jung Hee HongDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4299-6411
Samina ParkDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9625-2672
Hyungjin KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0722-0033
Jin Mo GooDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1791-7942
In Kyu ParkDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3550-5554
Chang Hyun KangDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1612-1937
Young Tae KimDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9006-4881
Soon Ho YoonDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. yshoka@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3700-0165

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the tumor doubling time of invasive lung adenocarcinoma according to the International Association of the Study for Lung Cancer (IASLC)/American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) histologic classification. MATERIALS AND

methodsAmong the 2905 patients with surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma, we retrospectively included 172 patients (mean age, 65.6 ± 9.0 years) who had paired thin-section non-contrast chest computed tomography (CT) scans at least 84 days apart with the same CT parameters, along with 10 patients with squamous cell carcinoma (mean age, 70.9 ± 7.4 years) for comparison. Three-dimensional semiautomatic segmentation of nodules was performed to calculate the volume doubling time (VDT), mass doubling time (MDT), and specific growth rate (SGR) of volume and mass. Multivariate linear regression, one-way analysis of variance, and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed.

resultsThe median VDT and MDT of lung cancers were as follows: acinar, 603.2 and 639.5 days; lepidic, 1140.6 and 970.1 days; solid/micropapillary, 232.7 and 221.8 days; papillary, 599.0 and 624.3 days; invasive mucinous, 440.7 and 438.2 days; and squamous cell carcinoma, 149.1 and 146.1 days, respectively. The adjusted SGR of volume and mass of the solid-/micropapillary-predominant subtypes were significantly shorter than those of the acinar-, lepidic-, and papillary-predominant subtypes. The histologic subtype was independently associated with tumor doubling time. A VDT of 465.2 days and an MDT of 437.5 days yielded areas under the curve of 0.791 and 0.795, respectively, for distinguishing solid-/micropapillary-predominant subtypes from other subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma.

conclusionThe tumor doubling time of invasive lung adenocarcinoma differed according to the IASCL/ATS/ERS histologic classification.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungAgedArea Under CurveCarcinoma, Squamous CellDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesROC CurveTomography, X-Ray ComputedWorld Health OrganizationAdenocarcinoma of lungDiagnostic imagingLung cancerTomography

Identifiers

PMID33169551
PMCPMC7909861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.