ArticleKorean journal of radiology2021
Development of a Malignancy Potential Binary Prediction Model Based on Deep Learning for the Mitotic Count of Local Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.
Article in Korean journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning based on preoperative CT for noninvasive prediction of recurrence-free survival in gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Article
- Multi-DECT image-based intra- and peritumoral interpretable radiomics and artificial intelligence models for preoperative prediction of pathological grading of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Comparative performance of ChatGPT-5 and DeepSeek on the Chinese ultrasound medicine senior professional title examination.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Characterization of adrenal glands on computed tomography with a 3D V-Net-based model.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Deep learning model combined with computed tomography features to preoperatively predicting the risk stratification of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Reporting Quality of Research Studies on AI Applications in Medical Images According to the CLAIM Guidelines in a Radiology Journal With a Strong Prominence in Asia.Korean journal of radiology · 2023Review
- Development and Validation of Artificial-Intelligence-Based Radiomics Model Using Computed Tomography Features for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a comprehensive radiological review.Japanese journal of radiology · 2022Review
- Deep learning and radiomics to predict the mitotic index of gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on multiparametric MRI.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe mitotic count of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is closely associated with the risk of planting and metastasis. The purpose of this study was to develop a predictive model for the mitotic index of local primary GIST, based on deep learning algorithm. MATERIALS AND
methodsAbdominal contrast-enhanced CT images of 148 pathologically confirmed GIST cases were retrospectively collected for the development of a deep learning classification algorithm. The areas of GIST masses on the CT images were retrospectively labelled by an experienced radiologist. The postoperative pathological mitotic count was considered as the gold standard (high mitotic count, > 5/50 high-power fields [HPFs]; low mitotic count, ≤ 5/50 HPFs). A binary classification model was trained on the basis of the VGG16 convolutional neural network, using the CT images with the training set (n = 108), validation set (n = 20), and the test set (n = 20). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated at both, the image level and the patient level. The receiver operating characteristic curves were generated on the basis of the model prediction results and the area under curves (AUCs) were calculated. The risk categories of the tumors were predicted according to the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology criteria.
resultsAt the image level, the classification prediction results of the mitotic counts in the test cohort were as follows: sensitivity 85.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.834-0.877), specificity 67.5% (95% CI: 0.636-0.712), PPV 82.1% (95% CI: 0.797-0.843), NPV 73.0% (95% CI: 0.691-0.766), and AUC 0.771 (95% CI: 0.750-0.791). At the patient level, the classification prediction results in the test cohort were as follows: sensitivity 90.0% (95% CI: 0.541-0.995), specificity 70.0% (95% CI: 0.354-0.919), PPV 75.0% (95% CI: 0.428-0.933), NPV 87.5% (95% CI: 0.467-0.993), and AUC 0.800 (95% CI: 0.563-0.943).
conclusionWe developed and preliminarily verified the GIST mitotic count binary prediction model, based on the VGG convolutional neural network. The model displayed a good predictive performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.