Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33169545›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of radiology2021

Development of a Malignancy Potential Binary Prediction Model Based on Deep Learning for the Mitotic Count of Local Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

Jiejin Yang, Zeyang Chen, Weipeng Liu, Xiangpeng Wang, Shuai Ma, Feifei Jin, Xiaoying Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Machine learning based on preoperative CT for noninvasive prediction of recurrence-free survival in gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jiejin Yang *Department of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3868-7050
Zeyang Chen *Department of General Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1102-6866
Weipeng LiuBeijing Smart Tree Medical Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7956-4874
Xiangpeng WangBeijing Smart Tree Medical Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0514-6589
Shuai MaDepartment of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0918-6510
Feifei JinDepartment of Biostatistics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4991-0158
Xiaoying WangDepartment of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China. wangxiaoying@bjmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-9822-961X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe mitotic count of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is closely associated with the risk of planting and metastasis. The purpose of this study was to develop a predictive model for the mitotic index of local primary GIST, based on deep learning algorithm. MATERIALS AND

methodsAbdominal contrast-enhanced CT images of 148 pathologically confirmed GIST cases were retrospectively collected for the development of a deep learning classification algorithm. The areas of GIST masses on the CT images were retrospectively labelled by an experienced radiologist. The postoperative pathological mitotic count was considered as the gold standard (high mitotic count, > 5/50 high-power fields [HPFs]; low mitotic count, ≤ 5/50 HPFs). A binary classification model was trained on the basis of the VGG16 convolutional neural network, using the CT images with the training set (n = 108), validation set (n = 20), and the test set (n = 20). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated at both, the image level and the patient level. The receiver operating characteristic curves were generated on the basis of the model prediction results and the area under curves (AUCs) were calculated. The risk categories of the tumors were predicted according to the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology criteria.

resultsAt the image level, the classification prediction results of the mitotic counts in the test cohort were as follows: sensitivity 85.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.834-0.877), specificity 67.5% (95% CI: 0.636-0.712), PPV 82.1% (95% CI: 0.797-0.843), NPV 73.0% (95% CI: 0.691-0.766), and AUC 0.771 (95% CI: 0.750-0.791). At the patient level, the classification prediction results in the test cohort were as follows: sensitivity 90.0% (95% CI: 0.541-0.995), specificity 70.0% (95% CI: 0.354-0.919), PPV 75.0% (95% CI: 0.428-0.933), NPV 87.5% (95% CI: 0.467-0.993), and AUC 0.800 (95% CI: 0.563-0.943).

conclusionWe developed and preliminarily verified the GIST mitotic count binary prediction model, based on the VGG convolutional neural network. The model displayed a good predictive performance.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAgedArea Under CurveCohort StudiesContrast MediaFemaleGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedMultidetector Computed TomographyPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityContrast MediaDeep learning Multidetector computed tomographyGastrointestinal stromal tumorsMitotic index

Identifiers

PMID33169545
PMCPMC7909867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.