Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33169515›Full record

SynthesisInternational wound journal2021

Efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to local wound infiltration anaesthesia: A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of 23 randomised controlled trials.

Yifeng Ren, Mengling Wei, Hong Liu, Yao Wang, Hairuo Chen, Zhuohong Li, Wei Shi, Fengming You

RetractedAbstract readMeta-AnalysisRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International wound journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yifeng Ren *Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Mengling Wei *Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Hong LiuHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Yao WangHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Hairuo ChenHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Zhuohong LiHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Wei ShiDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Fengming YouHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.

Funding

Science and Technology Developmental Foundation of Chengdu University of TCM QNXZ2019022Science and Technology Developmental Foundation of Chengdu University of TCM XSGG2019018Science and Technology Developmental Foundation of Chengdu University of TCM ZYTS2019008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To further identify the real efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to local wound infiltration anaesthesia, we conducted this meta-analysis. The systematic search strategy was performed using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Chinese databases. As a result, a total of 23 RCTs (1445 patients) were included. Patients receiving dexmedetomidine combined with local anaesthetics had a lower rescue analgesia rate [risk ratio (RR): 0.48; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36-0.65] and lower rescue analgesic consumption [weighted mean difference (WMD): -10.80 mg; 95%CI: -13.28 to -8.31 mg] than patients receiving local anaesthetics alone. The dexmedetomidine-related adverse reactions included bradycardia (RR: 1.33; 95%CI: 0.32-5.56) and hypotension (RR: 3.00; 95%CI: 0.49-18.42). In addition, the time to first analgesic request (WMD: 296.16 minutes; 95%CI: 165.69 minutes ~ 426.63 minutes), incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and pain scores at 4 hours postoperatively were also significantly lower in patients receiving dexmedetomidine combined with local anaesthetics. This meta-analysis demonstrated that the use of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to wound infiltration is effective for reducing the rescue analgesia rate, rescue analgesic consumption and PONV. In addition, limited evidence shows that dexmedetomidine can prolong postoperative analgesia for approximately 5 hours. Further investigations on dexmedetomidine-related adverse reactions and the dose-response effect of dexmedetomidine in wound infiltration are warranted.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, LocalDexmedetomidineAnesthetics, LocalFemaleHumansPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWounds and InjuriesAnesthetics, LocalDexmedetomidineadjuvantdexmedetomidinelocal wound infiltrationmeta-analysistrial sequential analysis

Identifiers

PMID33169515
PMCPMC7949019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.