Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33169433›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of geriatric psychiatry2021

Comparative risk of adverse outcomes associated with nonselective and selective antimuscarinic medications in older adults with dementia and overactive bladder.

Nandita Kachru, Holly M Holmes, Michael L Johnson, Hua Chen, Rajender R Aparasu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Effectiveness in Activating M-Type KInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nandita KachruDepartment of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2754-0723
Holly M HolmesDivision of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, Texas, USA.
Michael L JohnsonDepartment of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Hua ChenDepartment of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Rajender R AparasuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2310-901X
University of Houston · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center · US

Funding

SAFETY PROFILE OF ANTIMUSCARINICS IN ELDERLY DEMENTIA PATIENTSR15AG056997 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI APARASU, RAJENDER R · 2017 to 2017
$384k
NIA NIH HHS R15 AG056997
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe differential muscarinic receptor selectivity could cause selective antimuscarinics to offer advantages over nonselective agents with respect to adverse effects. The objective was to examine the comparative risk of falls/fractures and all-cause hospitalizations among older adults with dementia and overactive bladder (OAB) using nonselective and selective antimuscarinics METHODS/

designA retrospective cohort study design was conducted among older patients with dementia and OAB using incident antimuscarinics. The primary exposure was classified as nonselective (oxybutynin, tolterodine, trospium, and fesoterodine) and selective (solifenacin and darifenacin). Cox proportional-hazards regression using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) evaluated the risk of falls/fractures and all-cause hospitalizations within 6 months of nonselective and selective antimuscarinic use.

resultsThe study cohort consisted of 13,896 (76.9%) nonselective and 4,179 (23.1%) selective antimuscarinic incident users. The unadjusted falls/fractures rate was 27.14% (3,772) for nonselective and 24.55% (1,026) for selective users (p-value< 0.01). The unadjusted all-cause hospitalizations rate was 24.14% (3,354) for nonselective and 21.58% (902) for selective users (p-value <0.01). The IPTW models did not find a significant difference in the risk of falls/fractures (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.03; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.99-1.07) and risk of all-cause hospitalizations (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.99-1.08) between nonselective and selective antimuscarinics. Several sensitivity analyses corroborated the main findings.

conclusionsThe study did not find a differential risk of falls/fractures and all-cause hospitalizations in older adults with dementia and OAB using nonselective and selective antimuscarinics. More research is needed to understand the role of pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics in the safety profile of antimuscarinics in dementia.

Indexed as

DementiaUrinary Bladder, OveractiveAgedCohort StudiesHumansMuscarinic AntagonistsRetrospective StudiesMuscarinic Antagonistsdementiafalls/fractureshospitalizationsmuscarinic receptorsnonselective antimuscarinicsOABreceptor selectivityselective antimuscarinics

Identifiers

PMID33169433
PMCPMC9290172
OpenAlexW3101341551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.