Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33169327›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2021

Prognostic Factors After Neoadjuvant Imatinib for Newly Diagnosed Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor.

Michael J Cavnar, Kenneth Seier, Mithat Gönen, Christina Curtin, Vinod P Balachandran, William D Tap, Cristina R Antonescu, Sam Singer, Ronald P DeMatteo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Long-term outcomes of a phase II study of neoadjuvant imatinib in large gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2023
    Trial
  4. Long-Term Outcomes After Multiorgan Resection of Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: New Insights for a Multimodal Approach.Surgical oncology clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. [Surgical and interdisciplinary treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael J CavnarDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6197-7945
Kenneth SeierDepartment of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Mithat GönenDepartment of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Christina CurtinDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Vinod P BalachandranDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
William D TapDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Cristina R AntonescuDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Sam SingerDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Ronald P DeMatteoDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. ronald.dematteo@pennmedicine.edu.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center Support Grant ECIA SupplementP30CA177558 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KATHLEEN L. O'CONNOR · 2013 to 2026
$38.3M
Targeting Oncogenic Pathways in Genetically Complex SarcomasP50CA217694 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Marc Ladanyi · 2018 to 2026
$21.5M
Molecular Mechanisms in Gastrointestinal Stromal TumorR01CA102613 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Ronald P. Dematteo · 2004 to 2026
$9.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA177558NCI NIH HHS P50 CA217694NCI NIH HHS R01 CA102613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNeoadjuvant imatinib (Neo-IM) therapy may facilitate R0 resection in primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) that are large or in difficult anatomic locations. While response to preoperative tyrosine kinase inhibitors is associated with better outcome in metastatic GIST, little is known about prognostic factors after Neo-IM in primary GIST. STUDY

designPatients with primary GIST with or without synchronous metastases who underwent Neo-IM were retrospectively analyzed from a prospective maintained institutional database for Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), tumor viability, and mitotic rate. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier and compared by log-rank test. Cox proportionate hazard models were used for univariate and multivariate analysis.

resultsOne hundred and fifty patients were treated for a median of 7.1 months (range 0.2-160). By RECIST, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were seen in 40%, 51%, and 9%, respectively. By pathologic analysis, ≤ 50% of the tumor was viable in 72%, and the mitotic rate was ≤ 5/50HPF in 74%. On multivariate analysis, RECIST response and tumor viability were not associated with OS, while post-treatment high mitotic rate (hazard ratio (HR) for death 5.3, CI 2.3-12.4), R2 margins (HR 6.0, CI 2.3-15.5), and adjuvant imatinib (HR 0.4, CI 0.2-0.9) were (p < 0.05). Five-year OS was 81 vs. 38% for low vs. high mitotic rate; 81, 59, and 39% for R0, R1, and R2 margins; and 75 vs 61% for adjuvant vs. no adjuvant imatinib therapy (p < 0.05).

conclusionsIn primary GIST undergoing Neo-IM therapy, progression was uncommon, but substantial down-sizing occurred in the minority. High tumor mitotic rate and incomplete resection following Neo-IM were associated with poor outcome, while adjuvant imatinib was associated with prolonged survival.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHumansImatinib MesylateNeoadjuvant TherapyPrognosisProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic AgentsImatinib MesylateGastrointestinal stromal tumorGISTImatinibNeoadjuvantSurgery

Identifiers

PMID33169327
PMCPMC8386278
OpenAlexW3099103999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.