Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33169297›Full record

Observational studyLangenbeck's archives of surgery2021

Suspected appendicitis and COVID-19, a change in investigation and management-a multicentre cohort study.

W English, N Habib Bedwani, C Smith, E Doganay, M Marsden, S Muse, W K Mak, M Chana, J Eves, V Shatkar

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Rate of Application and Outcome of Non-operative Management of Acute Appendicitis in the Setting of COVID-19: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

W English *Department of General Surgery, Queens Hospital, BHR NHS Trust, London, UK. Billy.english100@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6674-3446
N Habib Bedwani *Department of General Surgery, Queens Hospital, BHR NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7302-9355
C SmithDepartment of General Surgery, Queens Hospital, BHR NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2795-0922
E DoganayDepartment of General Surgery, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
M MarsdenDepartment of General Surgery, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
S MuseDepartment of General Surgery, The Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
W K MakDepartment of General Surgery, The Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
M ChanaDepartment of General Surgery, The Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
J EvesDepartment of General Surgery, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
V ShatkarDepartment of General Surgery, Queens Hospital, BHR NHS Trust, London, UK.
Queen's Hospital · GBRoyal Devon and Exeter Hospital · GBBarts Health NHS Trust · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBQueen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe COVID-19 pandemic has reformed global healthcare delivery. On 25 March 2020, Intercollegiate guidelines were published in the UK to promote safe surgical provision during the COVID-19 outbreak advocating non-operative management or avoidance of laparoscopy when surgery is essential. The effects of this on the investigation and management of appendicitis remain unknown.

methodsWe performed a multicentre, prospective, observational study from the start of the new guidelines to the 6th of May 2020. We included all patients referred to surgical teams with suspected appendicitis. A recent historical cohort was identified for comparison. The primary outcome was the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use of non-operative management in appendicitis. Secondary outcomes included imaging, negative appendicectomy rate (NAR), length of stay (LOS) and 30-day complications.

resultsA total of 63/164 (38%) patients compared to 79/191 (41%) were diagnosed with appendicitis before and after the guidelines were introduced (p = 0.589). CT scanning increased (71/164 vs 105/191; p = 0.033) while ultrasound scanning decreased (71/164 vs 62/191; p = 0.037). Appendicitis was more likely to be managed non-operatively (11/63 vs 51/79; p < 0.001) and, of those managed surgically, with an open approach (3/52 vs 26/28 p < 0.001). The NAR also reduced (5/52 vs 0/28; p = 0.157). LOS was shorter in non-operatively managed patients (1 day vs 3 days; p < 0.001) without a difference in complications (10/51 vs 4/28; p = 0.760).

conclusionIntroduction of the guidelines was associated with changes in practice. Despite these changes, short-term complications did not increase and LOS decreased. Questions remain on the longer-term complication rates in non-operatively managed patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAppendectomyAppendicitisCohort StudiesCOVID-19FemaleHumansLaparoscopyLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAppendicitisCOVID-19LaparoscopyRIF pain

Identifiers

PMID33169297
PMCPMC7652586
OpenAlexW3103368533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.