Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33169227›Full record

ReviewNeurosurgical review2021

Resective epilepsy surgery: assessment of randomized controlled trials.

Samuel W Cramer, Robert A McGovern, Sonya G Wang, Clark C Chen, Michael C Park

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurosurgical review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Cenobamate for Difficult-to-Treat Epilepsy - Selected Case Vignettes.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The surgical treatment of epilepsy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samuel W CramerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 96, D-429 Mayo Memorial Building, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. Cram0080@umn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7103-4182
Robert A McGovernDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 96, D-429 Mayo Memorial Building, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Sonya G WangDepartment of Neurology, University of Minnesota, 516 Delaware St SE, 12-100 Phillips Wangensteen Building, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Clark C ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 96, D-429 Mayo Memorial Building, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Michael C ParkDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 96, D-429 Mayo Memorial Building, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epilepsy is the most common form of chronic neurologic disease. Here, we review the available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the efficacy of resective epilepsy surgery in select patients suffering from medically intractable epilepsy (defined as persistent epilepsy despite two or more antiepileptic drugs [AEDs]). Three RCTs (two adult RCTs and one pediatric RCT) consistently supported the efficacy of resective surgery as treatment for epilepsy with semiology localized to the mesial temporal lobe. In these studies, 58-100% of the patients who underwent resective surgery achieved seizure freedom, in comparison to 0-13% of medically treated patients. In another RCT, the likelihood of seizure freedom after resective surgery was independent of the surgical approach (transSylvian [64%] versus subtemporal [62%]). Two other RCTs demonstrated that hippocampal resection is essential to optimize seizure control. But, no significant gain in seizure control was achieved beyond removing 2.5 cm of the hippocampus. Across RCTs, minor complications (deficit lasting < 3 months) and major complications (deficit > 3 months) ranged 2-5% and 5-11% respectively. However, nonincapacitating superior subquadrantic visual-field defects (not typically considered a minor or major complication) were noted in up to 55% of the surgical cohort. The available RCTs provide compelling support for resective surgery as a treatment for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy and offer insights toward optimal surgical strategy.

Indexed as

EpilepsyAnticonvulsantsHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSeizuresTreatment OutcomeAnticonvulsantsEpilepsy surgeryFreedom from seizuresMedically intractable epilepsyResective epilepsy surgery

Identifiers

PMID33169227
OpenAlexW3098224200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.