Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33169211›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2021

Proactive Construction of an Annotated Imaging Database for Artificial Intelligence Training.

Caroline Bivik Stadler, Martin Lindvall, Claes Lundström, Anna Bodén, Karin Lindman, Jeronimo Rose, Darren Treanor, Johan Blomma, Karin Stacke, Nicolas Pinchaud and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Caroline Bivik StadlerCenter for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University Hospital, Linköping University, SE-581 85, Linköping, Sweden. caroline.bivik.stadler@liu.se.
Martin LindvallSectra AB, Teknikringen 20, SE-583 30, Linköping, Sweden.
Claes LundströmCenter for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University Hospital, Linköping University, SE-581 85, Linköping, Sweden.
Anna BodénCenter for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University Hospital, Linköping University, SE-581 85, Linköping, Sweden.
Karin LindmanCenter for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University Hospital, Linköping University, SE-581 85, Linköping, Sweden.
Jeronimo RoseCenter for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University Hospital, Linköping University, SE-581 85, Linköping, Sweden.
Darren TreanorCenter for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University Hospital, Linköping University, SE-581 85, Linköping, Sweden.
Johan BlommaDepartment of Radiology, Region Östergötland, Linköping University Hospital, SE-581 85, Linköping, Sweden.
Karin StackeSectra AB, Teknikringen 20, SE-583 30, Linköping, Sweden.
Nicolas PinchaudContextVision AB, Klara Norra Kyrkogata 31, SE-111 22, Stockholm, Sweden.
Martin HedlundContextVision AB, Klara Norra Kyrkogata 31, SE-111 22, Stockholm, Sweden.
Filip LandgrenDepartment of Radiology, Region Östergötland, Linköping University Hospital, SE-581 85, Linköping, Sweden.
Mischa WoisetschlägerCenter for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University Hospital, Linköping University, SE-581 85, Linköping, Sweden.
Daniel ForsbergSectra AB, Teknikringen 20, SE-583 30, Linköping, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) holds much promise for enabling highly desired imaging diagnostics improvements. One of the most limiting bottlenecks for the development of useful clinical-grade AI models is the lack of training data. One aspect is the large amount of cases needed and another is the necessity of high-quality ground truth annotation. The aim of the project was to establish and describe the construction of a database with substantial amounts of detail-annotated oncology imaging data from pathology and radiology. A specific objective was to be proactive, that is, to support undefined subsequent AI training across a wide range of tasks, such as detection, quantification, segmentation, and classification, which puts particular focus on the quality and generality of the annotations. The main outcome of this project was the database as such, with a collection of labeled image data from breast, ovary, skin, colon, skeleton, and liver. In addition, this effort also served as an exploration of best practices for further scalability of high-quality image collections, and a main contribution of the study was generic lessons learned regarding how to successfully organize efforts to construct medical imaging databases for AI training, summarized as eight guiding principles covering team, process, and execution aspects.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRadiologyAlgorithmsDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansRadiographyAnnotationArtificial intelligenceCase collectionPathologyRadiology

Identifiers

PMID33169211
PMCPMC7887127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.