Trial reportCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2021
A Phase 1 randomized study compare the pharmacokinetics, safety and immunogenicity of HLX02 to reference CN- and EU-sourced trastuzumab in healthy subjects.
Trial report in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02581748 (A Phase I Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Different Dosages of HLX02), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase I Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Different Dosages of HLX02 (Open-label Part) and to Compare the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity Between HLX02 and Herceptin® (US and Germany Sourced; Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel-group Part) in Healthy Chinese Male Subjects
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Phase I Clinical Study Comparing the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Immunogenicity of GB221 Injection and Trastuzumab (HerceptinEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2024Trial
- Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of HLX02 Compared with Reference Trastuzumab in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Randomized Phase III Equivalence Trial.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2021Trial
- Comparison of the efficacy and safety of HLX-02 plus pertuzumab versus HLX-02 plus pyrotinib in neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Article
- Real-World Efficacy of HLX02-Based Neoadjuvant Therapy in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: Clinical Insights and Future Directions.The breast journal · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of biosimilar trastuzumab (HLX02) in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer: a retrospective real-world analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Pathological response and safety of albumin-bound paclitaxel as a neoadjuvant treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer compared to docetaxel combined with anti-HER2 therapy: a real-world study.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- A multicenter real-world study comparing the clinical equivalence of trastuzumab biosimilar HLX02 and reference trastuzumab in the treatment of HER-2-positive breast cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2023Article
- Evaluating the efficacy and microenvironment changes of HER2 + gastric cancer during HLX02 and Endostar treatment using quantitative MRI.BMC cancer · 2022Article
- Systematic Review on the Use of Biosimilars of Trastuzumab in HER2+ Breast Cancer.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Biosimilar monoclonal antibodies in China: A patent review.Bioengineered · 2022Review
- Effectiveness and Safety of Zercepac and Reference Trastuzumab in the Neoadjuvant Setting for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of oncology · 2022Article
- Review
- Pharmacokinetics, Immunogenicity and Safety Study for SHR-1309 Injection and Perjeta® in Healthy Chinese Male Volunteers.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study evaluated the bioequivalence of China-manufactured biosimilar, HLX02, to reference China (CN)- and European Union (EU)-sourced trastuzumab.
methodsThis was a two-part Phase 1 study conducted in healthy Chinese males. Part 1 evaluated the safety of different doses of HLX02 (2, 4, 6 or 8 mg/kg; intravenous infusion over 90 min, n = 3 per group). Part 2, a randomized, double-blind study, investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety and immunogenicity of study drugs (HLX02 [n = 37], CN-trastuzumab [n = 35] or EU-trastuzumab [n = 37] at the dose suggested by Part 1 results). The primary PK endpoint was the area under the serum concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC
resultsIn Part 1, all doses of HLX02 were well tolerated and 6 mg/kg was suggested for Part 2. The GLSMRs and 90% CIs for AUC
conclusionThis study demonstrated comparable safety profiles and PK bioequivalence among HLX02, CN-trastuzumab and EU-trastuzumab in healthy Chinese male subjects. CLINICAL
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02581748, registered at October 19, 2015.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.