Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33169088›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2020

Tocilizumab in the treatment of rapidly evolving COVID-19 pneumonia and multifaceted critical illness: A retrospective case series.

Ahmed Mady, Waleed Aletreby, Basheer Abdulrahman, Mohammed Lhmdi, Alfateh M Noor, Saleh A Alqahtani, Ibrahim Soliman, Abdulrahman Alharthy, Dimitrios Karakitsos, Ziad A Memish

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Predictors and microbiology of respiratory and bloodstream bacterial infection in patients with COVID-19: living rapid review update and meta-regression.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ahmed MadyCritical Care Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Waleed AletrebyCritical Care Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Basheer AbdulrahmanCritical Care Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed LhmdiCritical Care Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Alfateh M NoorCritical Care Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Saleh A AlqahtaniDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
Ibrahim SolimanCritical Care Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman AlharthyCritical Care Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Dimitrios KarakitsosCritical Care Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ziad A MemishResearch & Innovation Centre, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Saud Medical City · SAAlfaisal University · SAJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 associated critical illness characterized by rapidly evolving acute respiratory failure (ARF) can develop, especially on the grounds of hyperinflammation. AIM AND

methodsA case-series of 61 patients admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU) between August 12 and September 12, 2020 with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia and rapidly evolving ARF requiring oxygen support therapy and/or mechanical ventilation was retrospectively analyzed. We examined whether intravenous administration of tocilizumab, a monoclonal interleukin-6 receptor antibody, was associated with improved outcome. All patients received empiric antivirals, dexamethasone 6 mg/day for 7 days, antibiotics, and prophylactic anticoagulation. Tocilizumab was administered at a dosage of 8 mg/kg [two consecutive intravenous infusions 12 h apart]. Outcome measures such as mortality on day-14, ICU length of stay, and rate of nosocomial acquired bacterial infections were also analyzed. Results: Patients were males (88.2%) aged 51 [interquartile range (IQR): 42.5-58.75)], with admission Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) 4 score of 53 (IQR: 37.75-72.5), and had more than one comorbidity (62.3%). On admission, twenty nine patients (47.5%) were mechanically ventilated, and thirty two patients (52.5%) were receiving oxygen therapy. No serious adverse effects due to tocilizumab therapy were recorded. However, twelve patients (19.6%) developed nosocomial acquired infections. ICU length of stay was 13 (IQR: 9-17) days, and mortality on day-14 was 24.6%. Six patients were shifted to other hospitals but were followed-up. The overall mortality on day-30 was 31.1%. Non-mechanically ventilated patients had higher survival rates compared to mechanically ventilated patients although results were not significant [hazards ratio = 2.6 (95% confidence intervals: 0.9-7.7), p = 0.08]. Tocilizumab did not affect the mortality of critically ill COVID-19 patients.

conclusionTocilizumab could be an adjunct safe therapy in rapidly evolving COVID-19 pneumonia and associated critical illness.

Indexed as

Acute respiratory failureCOVID-19 pneumoniaMechanical ventilationTocilizumab

Identifiers

PMID33169088
PMCPMC7642808
OpenAlexW3096105852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.