Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33169033›Full record

ReviewNature neuroscience2020

Quantifying behavior to understand the brain.

Talmo D Pereira, Joshua W Shaevitz, Mala Murthy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 168 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
168citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

168 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ecological Visual Processing in the Mouse.Annual review of neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Incentive salience, not psychomotor sensitization or tolerance, drives escalation of cocaine self-administration in heterogeneous stock rats.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Whole-body 3D kinematics of freely behavingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

108 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Talmo D PereiraPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9075-8365
Joshua W ShaevitzDepartment of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8809-4723
Mala MurthyPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA. mmurthy@princeton.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3063-3389

Funding

Uncovering the Neural Mechanisms that Flexibly Link Sensory Processing to BehaviorR35NS111580 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Mala Murthy · 2019 to 2026
$5.0M
Dissecting Sensorimotor Pathways Underlying Social Interactions: Models, Circuits, and BehaviorR01NS104899 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI BIALEK, WILLIAM, MURTHY, MALA · 2018 to 2022
$2.4M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNINDS NIH HHS R01 NS104899NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS111580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past years, numerous methods have emerged to automate the quantification of animal behavior at a resolution not previously imaginable. This has opened up a new field of computational ethology and will, in the near future, make it possible to quantify in near completeness what an animal is doing as it navigates its environment. The importance of improving the techniques with which we characterize behavior is reflected in the emerging recognition that understanding behavior is an essential (or even prerequisite) step to pursuing neuroscience questions. The use of these methods, however, is not limited to studying behavior in the wild or in strictly ethological settings. Modern tools for behavioral quantification can be applied to the full gamut of approaches that have historically been used to link brain to behavior, from psychophysics to cognitive tasks, augmenting those measurements with rich descriptions of how animals navigate those tasks. Here we review recent technical advances in quantifying behavior, particularly in methods for tracking animal motion and characterizing the structure of those dynamics. We discuss open challenges that remain for behavioral quantification and highlight promising future directions, with a strong emphasis on emerging approaches in deep learning, the core technology that has enabled the markedly rapid pace of progress of this field. We then discuss how quantitative descriptions of behavior can be leveraged to connect brain activity with animal movements, with the ultimate goal of resolving the relationship between neural circuits, cognitive processes and behavior.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehaviorBehavior, AnimalBrainHumansNeurosciences

Identifiers

PMID33169033
PMCPMC7780298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.