Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33168941›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Lateral diffusion of CD14 and TLR2 in macrophage plasma membrane assessed by raster image correlation spectroscopy and single particle tracking.

Sara Makaremi, Markus Rose, Suman Ranjit, Michelle A Digman, Dawn M E Bowdish, Jose M Moran-Mirabal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. [Simulation of gas chromatographic separation based on random diffusion].Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sara MakaremiSchool of Biomedical Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Markus RoseDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Suman RanjitDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular and Cellular Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Michelle A DigmanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Dawn M E BowdishDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. bowdish@mcmaster.ca.
Jose M Moran-MirabalSchool of Biomedical Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. mirabj@mcmaster.ca.
McMaster University · CAGeorgetown University · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

TRD4: Phasor analysisP41GM103540 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI GRATTON, ENRICO · 2012 to 2020
$12.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103540NIH HHS 8P41GM103540
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diffusion of membrane receptors is central to many biological processes, such as signal transduction, molecule translocation, and ion transport, among others; consequently, several advanced fluorescence microscopy techniques have been developed to measure membrane receptor mobility within live cells. The membrane-anchored receptor cluster of differentiation 14 (CD14) and the transmembrane toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) are important receptors in the plasma membrane of macrophages that activate the intracellular signaling cascade in response to pathogenic stimuli. The aim of the present work was to compare the diffusion coefficients of CD14 and TLR2 on the apical and basal membranes of macrophages using two fluorescence-based methods: raster image correlation spectroscopy (RICS) and single particle tracking (SPT). In the basal membrane, the diffusion coefficients obtained from SPT and RICS were found to be comparable and revealed significantly faster diffusion of CD14 compared with TLR2. In addition, RICS showed that the diffusion of both receptors was significantly faster in the apical membrane than in the basal membrane, suggesting diffusion hindrance by the adhesion of the cells to the substrate. This finding highlights the importance of selecting the appropriate membrane (i.e., basal or apical) and corresponding method when measuring receptor diffusion in live cells. Accurately knowing the diffusion coefficient of two macrophage receptors involved in the response to pathogen insults will facilitate the study of changes that occur in signaling in these cells as a result of aging and disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell MembraneLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsMacrophagesMiceMicroscopy, FluorescenceRAW 264.7 CellsSingle Molecule ImagingToll-Like Receptor 2Cd14 protein, mouseLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsTlr2 protein, mouseToll-Like Receptor 2

Identifiers

PMID33168941
PMCPMC7652837
OpenAlexW3106468124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.