ArticleScientific reports2020
Comparative analysis of magnetized partially ionized copper, copper oxide-water and kerosene oil nanofluid flow with Cattaneo-Christov heat flux.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A numerical study on the flow of water-based ternary hybrid nanomaterials on a stretchable curved sheet.Nanoscale advances · 2023Article
- Comparative molecular dynamics simulations of thermal conductivities of aqueous and hydrocarbon nanofluids.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2022Article
- Bioconvective Reiner-Rivlin nanofluid flow over a rotating disk with Cattaneo-Christov flow heat flux and entropy generation analysis.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Multiple slips impact in the MHD hybrid nanofluid flow with Cattaneo-Christov heat flux and autocatalytic chemical reaction.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Finite Element Study of Bio-Convective Stefan Blowing Ag-MgO/Water Hybrid Nanofluid Induced by Stretching Cylinder Utilizing Non-Fourier and Non-Fick's Laws.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This comparative analysis studies the impact of two different nanoparticles Copper and Copper Oxide in two different partially ionized magnetofluid (water and kerosene oil mixed with Copper/Copper Oxide) flows over a linearly stretching surface. The impacts of electrons and ions collisions in the presence of the Cattaneo-Christov heat transfer model are also investigated. The effects of prominent parameters on velocity and temperature fields are depicted through graphical illustrations. A similarity transformation procedure is applied to transform the nonlinear partial differential equations to the ordinary one. Our numerical methodology is based upon the Finite difference method that is the default method in the bvp4c built-in function of the MATLAB scheme. Nusselt number and Skin drag coefficient are computed numerically and presented in tabular form for both types of nanofluids over a linear stretched surface. Our results demonstrate that the effects of CuO are dominant in comparison to the Cu on fluid velocity. The fluid temperature is more prominent in the case of Cu-water nanofluid when we increase nanoparticles concentration.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.