Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33168873›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Comparing the efficacy of trabeculectomy and XEN gel microstent implantation for the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma: a retrospective monocentric comparative cohort study.

Theresa Theilig, Matus Rehak, Catharina Busch, Caroline Bormann, Marc Schargus, Jan Darius Unterlauft

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. The efficacy and safety of the XEN63 glaucoma gel stent without Mitomycin C over the first 10 years.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  8. Referral for glaucoma surgery and types of surgery in different European regions in 2025, the EURACCUR study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. XENGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Results of open bleb revision as management of primary bleb failure following XEN 45 gel stent and Preserflo™ Microshunt.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Theresa TheiligDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Clinic Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 10-14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Matus RehakDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Clinic Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 10-14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Catharina BuschDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Clinic Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 10-14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Caroline BormannDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Clinic Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 10-14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Marc SchargusDepartment of Ophthalmology, Asklepios Clinic Heidberg, Tangstedter Landstrasse 400, 22417, Hamburg, Germany.
Jan Darius UnterlauftDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Clinic Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 10-14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. JanDarius.Unterlauft@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Leipzig University · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety profile of XEN microstent implantation with trabeculectomy (TET) in a comparable group of open-angle glaucoma cases in a retrospective, monocentric, single-surgeon setting. Each treatment group consisted of 100 eyes of 100 patients. At regular follow-up visits during the first 12 months after surgery, the following assessments were conducted and compared: intraocular pressure (IOP), number of IOP-lowering medications applied, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and visual field testing. In both groups mean IOP was significantly reduced (p < 0.001). Mean IOP dropped from 24.8 ± 7.8 to 14.8 ± 4.0 mmHg in the TET and from 24.5 ± 6.7 to 16.6 ± 4.8 mmHg in the XEN group. The number of active compounds in the prescribed medication dropped from 3.3 ± 1.2 to 1.3 ± 1.4 in the TET and from 3.0 ± 1.1 to 1.4 ± 1.5 in the XEN group. BCVA and mean defect of static automated perimetry did not show a change of statistical significance in either group. Complications were more frequent after TET (p = 0.005) while postoperative needling was more frequent in the XEN group (p = 0.021). TET and XEN led to a significant reduction of IOP and IOP-lowering medication, while BCVA and visual field indices remained mostly unaltered over a 12-month postsurgical follow-up.

Indexed as

GelsIntraocular PressureStentsFollow-Up StudiesGlaucoma Drainage ImplantsGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansMitomycinRetrospective StudiesTonometry, OcularTrabeculectomyTreatment OutcomeVision, OcularVisual AcuityGelsMitomycin

Identifiers

PMID33168873
PMCPMC7653954
OpenAlexW3105154521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.