ArticleScientific reports2020
Targeted sequencing reveals the somatic mutation landscape in a Swedish breast cancer cohort.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeting CDKs in the RNAPII transcription cycle.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026Review
- Cyclin-dependent protein kinases and cell cycle regulation in biology and disease.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- The modification role and tumor association with a methyltransferase: KMT2C.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Clinico-genomic findings, molecular docking, and mutational spectrum in an understudied population with breast cancer patients from KP, Pakistan.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Omics-Based Investigations of Breast Cancer.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Genomic Landscape of Normal and Breast Cancer Tissues in a Hungarian Pilot Cohort.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Genome-wide differential DNA methylation analysis of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells treated with curcumin derivatives, ST08 and ST09.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Evaluation of cfDNA as an early detection assay for dense tissue breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Clinical and genomic analyses of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022Article
- Functional characterization of the human Cdk10/Cyclin Q complex.Open biology · 2022Article
- Towards an accurate and robust analysis pipeline for somatic mutation calling.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Association of Pathway Mutations With Survival in Taiwanese Breast Cancers.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Histone methylation in pancreatic cancer and its clinical implications.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is a genetically heterogeneous disease with high prevalence in Northern Europe. However, there has been no detailed investigation into the Scandinavian somatic landscape. Here, in a homogeneous Swedish cohort, we describe the somatic events underlying BC, leveraging a targeted next-generation sequencing approach. We designed a 20.5 Mb array targeting coding and regulatory regions of genes with a known role in BC (n = 765). The selected genes were either from human BC studies (n = 294) or from within canine mammary tumor associated regions (n = 471). A set of predominantly estrogen receptor positive tumors (ER + 85%) and their normal tissue counterparts (n = 61) were sequenced to ~ 140 × and 85 × mean target coverage, respectively. MuTect2 and VarScan2 were employed to detect single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and copy number aberrations (CNAs), while MutSigCV (SNVs) and GISTIC (CNAs) algorithms estimated the significance of recurrent somatic events. The significantly mutated genes (q ≤ 0.01) were PIK3CA (28% of patients), TP53 (21%) and CDH1 (11%). However, histone modifying genes contained the largest number of variants (KMT2C and ARID1A, together 28%). Mutations in KMT2C were mutually exclusive with PI3KCA mutations (p ≤ 0. 001) and half of these affect the formation of a functional PHD domain. The tumor suppressor CDK10 was deleted in 80% of the cohort while the oncogene MDM4 was amplified. Mutational signature analyses pointed towards APOBEC deaminase activity (COSMIC signature 2) and DNA mismatch repair (COSMIC signature 6). We noticed two significantly distinct patterns related to patient age; TP53 being more mutated in the younger group (29% vs 9% of patients) and CDH23 mutations were absent from the older group. The increased somatic mutation prevalence in the histone modifying genes KMT2C and ARID1A distinguishes the Swedish cohort from previous studies. KMT2C regulates enhancer activation and assists tumor proliferation in a hormone-rich environment, possibly pointing to a role in ER + BC, especially in older cases. Finally, age of onset appears to affect the mutational landscape suggesting that a larger age-diverse population incorporating more molecular subtypes should be studied to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.