Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33168803›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

A circumpolar dust conveyor in the glacial Southern Ocean.

Torben Struve, Katharina Pahnke, Frank Lamy, Marc Wengler, Philipp Böning, Gisela Winckler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Testing the Ce Limit of Mass Bias Correction UsingRapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Phytoplankton responses to dust addition in the Fe-Mn co-limited eastern Pacific sub-Antarctic differ by source region.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Systematic changes in circumpolar dust transport to the Subantarctic Pacific Ocean over the last two glacial cycles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Torben StruveMarine Isotope Geochemistry, Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment (ICBM), University of Oldenburg, 26129, Oldenburg, Germany. t.struve@icbm.de.ORCID 0000-0002-6453-5552
Katharina PahnkeMarine Isotope Geochemistry, Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment (ICBM), University of Oldenburg, 26129, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9114-8411
Frank LamyAlfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, 27568, Bremerhaven, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5952-1765
Marc WenglerAlfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, 27568, Bremerhaven, Germany.
Philipp BöningMarine Isotope Geochemistry, Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment (ICBM), University of Oldenburg, 26129, Oldenburg, Germany.
Gisela WincklerLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, New York, 10964, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8718-2684
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DEAlfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung · DELamont-Doherty Earth Observatory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increased flux of soluble iron (Fe) to the Fe-deficient Southern Ocean by atmospheric dust is considered to have stimulated the net primary production and carbon export, thus promoting atmospheric CO

Identifiers

PMID33168803
PMCPMC7652835
OpenAlexW3104786791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.