Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33168635›Full record

ArticleBMJ quality & safety2021

Factors influencing physician responsiveness to nurse-initiated communication: a qualitative study.

Milisa Manojlovich, Molly Harrod, Timothy Hofer, Megan Lafferty, Michaella McBratnie, Sarah L Krein

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Creating Clarity Amid the Operating Room Clamor: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Noise-Related Barriers and Facilitators to Effective Communication.ORL-head and neck nursing : official journal of the Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Nurses · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Milisa ManojlovichSchool of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA mmanojlo@umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6101-5535
Molly HarrodCenter for Clinical Management Research, Department of Veterans Affair, Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Timothy HoferCenter for Clinical Management Research, Department of Veterans Affair, Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0434-8787
Megan LaffertySchool of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Michaella McBratnieSchool of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Sarah L KreinCenter for Clinical Management Research, Department of Veterans Affair, Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2111-8131
University of Michigan · US

Funding

The Effect of Health Information Technology on Healthcare Provider CommunicationR01HS022305 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MANOJLOVICH, MILISA · 2014 to 2014
$1.6M
Videotaping Communication between Physicians and Nurses: A methods studyR03HS024760 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MANOJLOVICH, MILISA · 2016 to 2016
$100k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS022305AHRQ HHS R03 HS024760HSRD VA IK6 HX003399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHow quickly physicians respond to communications from bedside nurses is important for the delivery of safe inpatient care. Delays in physician responsiveness can impede care or contribute to patient harm. Understanding contributory factors to physician responsiveness can provide insights to promote timely physician response, possibly improving communication to ensure safe patient care. The purpose of this study was to describe the factors contributing to physician responsiveness to text or numeric pages, telephone calls and face-to-face messages delivered by nurses on adult general care units.

methodsUsing a qualitative design, we collected data through observation, shadowing, interviews and focus groups of bedside registered nurses and physicians who worked in four hospitals in the Midwest USA. We analysed the data using inductive content analysis.

resultsA total of 155 physicians and nurses participated. Eighty-six nurses and 32 physicians participated in focus groups or individual interviews; we shadowed 37 physicians and nurses across all sites. Two major inter-related themes emerged, message and non-message related factors. Message-related factors included the medium nurses used to convey messages, physician preference for notification via one communication medium over another and the clarity of the message, all of which could cause confusion and thus a delayed response. Non-message related factors included trust and interpersonal relationships, and different perspectives between nurses and physicians on the same clinical issue that affected perceptions of urgency, and contributed to delays in responsiveness.

conclusionsPhysician responsiveness to communications from bedside nurses depends on a complex combination of factors related to the message itself and non-message related factors. How quickly physicians respond is a multifactorial phenomenon, and strategies to promote a timely response within the context of a given situation must be directed to both groups.

Indexed as

CommunicationPhysiciansAdultFocus GroupsHumansPatient CareQualitative Researchcommunicationhealth services researchhospital medicineinformation technologypatient safety

Identifiers

PMID33168635
PMCPMC8140397
OpenAlexW3102069144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.