Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33168461›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology focus2021

Partial Response and Stable Disease Correlate with Positive Outcomes in Atezolizumab-treated Patients with Advanced Urinary Tract Carcinoma.

Jens Bedke, Axel S Merseburger, Yohann Loriot, Daniel Castellano, Ernest Choy, Ignacio Duran, Jonathan E Rosenberg, Daniel P Petrylak, Robert Dreicer, Jose L Perez-Gracia and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology focus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 16 institutions in 8 countries.

Jens BedkeDepartment of Urology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. Electronic address: jens.bedke@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
Axel S MerseburgerDepartment of Urology, Campus Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
Yohann LoriotDepartment of Cancer Medicine and Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U981, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Daniel CastellanoMedical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Ernest ChoyCREATE Centre, Section of Rheumatology, Division of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
Ignacio DuranHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Seville, Spain.
Jonathan E RosenbergMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Daniel P PetrylakSmilow Cancer Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Robert DreicerUniversity of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Jose L Perez-GraciaClínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Navarre, Spain.
Jean H Hoffman-CensitsThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Michiel S Van Der HeijdenThe Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Julie PavlovaF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Lars ThiebachRoche Pharma AG, Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany.
Sabine de DuclaF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Simon FearF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Thomas PowlesBarts Cancer Institute, Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Queen Mary University of London, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK.
Cora N SternbergSan Camillo and Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy.
Roche (Switzerland) · CHCardiff University · GBCarlo Forlanini Hospital · ITClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío · ESInserm · FRMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USQueen Mary University of London · GBRoche Pharma AG (Germany) · DESidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · USThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity of Lübeck · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DEUniversity of Virginia Cancer CenterYale University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe value of a complete response to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment for urothelial cancer is well recognised, but less is known about long-term outcomes in patients with a partial response or the benefit of achieving disease stabilisation.

objectiveTo determine clinical outcomes in patients with a partial response or stable disease on atezolizumab therapy for advanced urinary tract carcinoma (UTC). DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsData were extracted from three prospective trials (IMvigor210 cohort 2, SAUL, and IMvigor211) evaluating single-agent atezolizumab therapy for platinum-pretreated advanced UTC. The analysis population included 604 atezolizumab-treated and 208 chemotherapy-treated patients (229 achieving a partial response and 583 achieving stable disease).

interventionAtezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 wk until progression or unacceptable toxicity or single-agent chemotherapy for patients in the control arm of IMvigor211. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Baseline characteristics, treatment exposure, overall survival, duration of disease control. Partial response and stable disease populations were analysed separately. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The population of patients with a partial response included more patients with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on ≥5% of tumour-infiltrating immune cells than the stable disease population. The median time to best response was 2.1 mo across trials and treatments, regardless of the type of response. Atezolizumab-treated patients with a partial response had sustained disease control (median overall survival not reached); durations of disease control and overall survival were longer with atezolizumab than with chemotherapy. In patients with stable disease, median overall survival was numerically longer with atezolizumab (exceeding 1 yr) than with chemotherapy. Irrespective of treatment, durations of disease control and survival were shorter in patients with stable disease than in those achieving a partial response. These analyses are limited by their post hoc exploratory nature and relatively short follow-up.

conclusionsStable disease and partial response are meaningful clinical outcomes in atezolizumab-treated patients with advanced UTC. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we looked at the outcomes in patients whose tumours responded to treatment to some extent, but the tumour did not disappear completely. We aimed to understand whether a modest response to treatment was associated with meaningful long-term outcomes for patients. We found that on average, life expectancy was >1 yr in patients whose disease was stabilised and even longer in those whose tumours showed some shrinkage in response to treatment.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCarcinoma, Transitional CellUrologic NeoplasmsHumansProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedatezolizumabAtezolizumabImmunotherapyPartial responseProgrammed cell death ligand 1Stable diseaseUrothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID33168461
PMCPMC9437861
OpenAlexW3095668945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.