Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33168360›Full record

ArticleJournal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation2023

Evaluating the Quality of Rigid Optic Videolaryngoscopy Image Taken Through Dental Protection Cap and Its Feasibility as Additional Barrier Method Against COVID-19.

Mariana Nagata Cavalheiro, Vinicius Ribas Fonseca, Bianca Simone Zeigelboim, Diego F Costa, Lucas Viomar de Lima, Marlon Kleber Bozzo, Rita de Cássia Tonochi, Bruno Ceron Hartmann

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mariana Nagata CavalheiroLauro Grein Filho Center for Otorhinolaryngological Studies.
Vinicius Ribas FonsecaLauro Grein Filho Center for Otorhinolaryngological Studies; Positivo University; Postgraduate Program in Communication Disorders, Tuiuti do Paraná University; Brazilian Red Cross Hospital, Paraná, Brazil.
Bianca Simone ZeigelboimPostgraduate Program in Communication Disorders, Tuiuti do Paraná University.
Diego F CostaLauro Grein Filho Center for Otorhinolaryngological Studies.
Lucas Viomar de LimaLauro Grein Filho Center for Otorhinolaryngological Studies.
Marlon Kleber BozzoCommunication Disorders at Tuiuti do Paraná University.
Rita de Cássia TonochiCommunication Disorders at Tuiuti do Paraná University.
Bruno Ceron HartmannLauro Grein Filho Center for Otorhinolaryngological Studies. Electronic address: hartmannbc@gmail.com.
Instituto Lauro de Souza Lima · BRUniversidade Tuiuti do Paraná · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Videolaryngoscopy screening is essential to help assessing human larynx. The use of 70° optical fiber in association with image recording by analog or digital cameras is one of the methods adopted to perform this examination. Endoscopic exams can contaminate the equipment with several microorganisms. The pandemic caused by the new coronavirus reinforces the importance of developing efficient barrier methods to be adopted in videolaryngoscopy procedures. Although dental intraoral camera covers are a barrier method authorized by Brazilian health organs, it has not yet been used in videolaryngoscopy examinations. The aim of the current longitudinal, individualized, single-blind, prospective, self-controlled, and accurate study is to evaluate the quality of images generated through, and confidence level of, diagnosis based on videolaryngoscopy performed with intraoral dental camera equipped with disposable protection cap and connected to 70° rigid laryngoscope in vocally healthy individuals. Videolaryngoscopy examinations based on 70° rigid optics were performed in 13 euphonic and asymptomatic volunteers at an otorhinolaryngology specialist clinic; only 1 patient was excluded from the study. Images were taken with, and without, disposable intraoral dental camera protection cap; high-grade disinfection protocol was applied between examinations. Recorded videos were randomly distributed in a single-blind manner in order to be evaluated by four otorhinolaryngologists, who answered a questionnaire comprising three questions. Statistical analysis was used to compare groups - which were defined by the use, or not, of protection cap - based on Wilcoxon nonparametric test. Statistical significance was set at 5% with 95% confidence interval. There was no statistically significant difference in image quality between examinations performed with, and without, protection cap (P= 0.646) or in the diagnosis confidence level of examinations performed with, or without, the barrier method. The use of disposable protection cap on intraoral dental camera did not significantly change the quality of images taken through videolaryngoscopy performed with 70° rigid optics in vocally healthy patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19LaryngoscopesFeasibility StudiesHumansLaryngoscopyProspective StudiesSingle-Blind MethodBarrierCoronavirusCOVID-19DentalImageLaryngoscopyProtection

Identifiers

PMID33168360
PMCPMC7605857
OpenAlexW3097341993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.