Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33168091›Full record

ArticleActa neuropathologica communications2020

Chromosomal instability in the prediction of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors prognosis.

Hélène Lasolle, Mad-Hélénie Elsensohn, Anne Wierinckx, Eudeline Alix, Clément Bonnefille, Alexandre Vasiljevic, Christine Cortet, Bénédicte Decoudier, Nathalie Sturm, Stephan Gaillard and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neuropathologica communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical characteristics associated with somaticFrontiers in endocrinology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pathogenesis of nonfamilial somatotroph adenomas.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Somatic Activating ESR1 Mutation in an Aggressive Prolactinoma.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Aggressive Pituitary Tumors and Pituitary Carcinomas: From Pathology to Treatment.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2023
    Article
  20. The hallmarks of cancer… in pituitary tumors?Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Hélène LasolleFédération d'endocrinologie, Centre de Référence des Maladies Rares Hypophysaires, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 8 av Doyen Lepine, 69677, Bron Cedex, France.
Mad-Hélénie ElsensohnUniversité Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Anne WierinckxUniversité Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Eudeline AlixService de Cytogénétique, Centre de Biologie et Pathologie Est, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France.
Clément BonnefilleService de Cytogénétique, Centre de Biologie et Pathologie Est, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France.
Alexandre VasiljevicUniversité Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Christine CortetService d'Endocrinologie, CHRU de Lille, Hopital Huriez, 59037, Lille Cedex, France.
Bénédicte DecoudierService d'Endocrinologie - Diabète - Nutrition, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims, Reims, Champagne-Ardenne, France.
Nathalie SturmDépartement d'Anatomie et cytologie pathologique, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Stephan GaillardDepartment of Neurosurgery, Foch Hospital, 92151, Suresnes, France.
Amandine FerrièreDepartment of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Nutrition, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Pascal RoyUniversité Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Emmanuel JouanneauUniversité Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Philippe BertolinoINSERM U1052, CNRS UMR5286, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, 69372, Lyon, France.
Claire BardelUniversité Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Damien SanlavilleUniversité Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Gérald RaverotFédération d'endocrinologie, Centre de Référence des Maladies Rares Hypophysaires, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 8 av Doyen Lepine, 69677, Bron Cedex, France. gerald.raverot@chu-lyon.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-9517-338X
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims · FRHôpital Foch · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of copy number variations (CNV) on sporadic pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) prognosis, to identify specific prognosis markers according to the known clinico-pathological classification. CGH array analysis was performed on 195 fresh-frozen PitNETs (56 gonadotroph, 11 immunonegative, 56 somatotroph, 39 lactotroph and 33 corticotroph), with 5 years post-surgery follow-up (124 recurrences), classified according to the five-tiered grading classification (invasion, Ki-67, mitotic index and p53 positivity). Effect of alterations on recurrence was studied using logistic regression models. Transcriptomic analysis of 32 lactotroph tumors was performed. The quantity of CNV was dependent on tumor type: higher in lactotroph (median(min-max) = 38% (0-97) of probes) compared to corticotroph (11% (0-77)), somatotroph (5% (0-99)), gonadotroph (0% (0-10)) and immunonegative tumors (0% (0-17). It was not predictive of recurrence in the whole cohort. In lactotroph tumors, genome instability, especially quantity of gains, significantly predicted recurrence independently of invasion and proliferation (p-value = 0.02, OR = 1.2). However, no specific CNV was found as a prognostic marker. Transcriptomic analysis of the genes included in the CNV and associated with prognosis didn't show significantly overrepresented pathway. In somatotroph and corticotroph tumors, USP8 and GNAS mutations were not associated with genome disruption or recurrence respectively. To conclude, CGH array analysis showed genome instability was dependent on PitNET type. Lactotroph tumors were highly altered and the quantity of altered genome was associated with poorer prognosis though the mechanism is unclear, whereas gonadotroph and immunonegative tumors showed the same 'quiet' profile, leaving the mechanism underlying tumorigenesis open to question.

Indexed as

ACTH-Secreting Pituitary AdenomaAdenomaAdultChromograninsChromosomal InstabilityComparative Genomic HybridizationDNA Copy Number VariationsEndopeptidasesEndosomal Sorting Complexes Required for TransportFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenomic InstabilityGonadotrophsGrowth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary AdenomaGTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, GsHumansChromograninsEndopeptidasesEndosomal Sorting Complexes Required for TransportGNAS protein, humanGTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, GsUbiquitin ThiolesteraseUSP8 protein, humanCopy number variationsGenomic instabilityPituitary adenomaPituitary neuroendocrine tumorsPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID33168091
PMCPMC7653703
OpenAlexW3103322707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.