Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33168085›Full record

ReviewAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2020

Education and training programmes for infection prevention and control professionals: mapping the current opportunities and local needs in European countries.

Constantinos Tsioutis, Gabriel Birgand, Erik Bathoorn, Aleksander Deptula, Lenny Ten Horn, Enrique Castro-Sánchez, Oana Săndulescu, Andreas F Widmer, Athanasios Tsakris, Giulio Pieve and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Current state and potential of hospitals for automated healthcare-associated infection surveillance: data from 24 European countries, 2022 to 2023.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Designing an optimal infection prevention service: Part 1.Journal of infection prevention · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Constantinos TsioutisSchool of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Gabriel BirgandEuropean Committee On Infection Control (EUCIC), Basel, Switzerland.
Erik BathoornDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Aleksander DeptulaDepartment of Propaedeutics of Medicine and Infection Prevention, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Control Unit, Antoni Jurasz University Hospital No. 1, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Lenny Ten HornDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Enrique Castro-SánchezNIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London, UK.
Oana SăndulescuCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Andreas F WidmerInfectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Athanasios TsakrisEuropean Committee On Infection Control (EUCIC), Basel, Switzerland.
Giulio PieveClinical management staff, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Evelina TacconelliEuropean Committee On Infection Control (EUCIC), Basel, Switzerland.
Nico T MuttersEuropean Committee On Infection Control (EUCIC), Basel, Switzerland. nico.mutters@ukbonn.de.ORCID 0000-0002-0156-9595

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies have repeatedly highlighted the need for homogenisation of training content and opportunities in infection prevention and control (IPC) across European countries.

objectivesTo map current training opportunities for IPC professionals, define local needs and highlight differences, across 11 European countries (Cyprus, France, England, Germany, Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Spain, Switzerland). SOURCES: From July 2018 to February 2019, IPC experts directly involved in IPC training and education in their countries and/or internationally were invited to complete a prespecified set of questions in order to provide a detailed description of IPC training opportunities and needs in their country.

conclusionsIPC training among nurses and doctors varies greatly across countries, with differences in content and type of training (e.g., standardised curriculum, educational programme, clinical experience) duration, as well as in assessment and recognition/accreditation. The observed heterogeneity in IPC training between European countries can be eliminated through establishment of interdisciplinary region-wide training programmes, with common learning objectives, shared know-how and supported by national and international professional bodies.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, ContinuingEuropeHumansInfection ControlCertificationEducationInfection controlInfection preventionQualificationsTraining

Identifiers

PMID33168085
PMCPMC7652580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.