Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33168032›Full record

ArticleActa veterinaria Scandinavica2020

Wild boar behaviour during live-trap capture in a corral-style trap: implications for animal welfare.

Åsa Fahlman, Johan Lindsjö, Therese Arvén Norling, Petter Kjellander, Erik Olof Ågren, Ulrika Alm Bergvall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A behavioral study of live captured coypu (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Stress Assessment of Wild Boar (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Åsa FahlmanSLU Swedish Biodiversity Centre, Department of Urban and Rural Development, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), 75007, Uppsala, Sweden. asa.fahlman@slu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9092-5514
Johan LindsjöDepartment of Animal Environment and Health, SLU, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden.
Therese Arvén NorlingGenome Engineering Zebrafish National Facility, SciLifeLab, Uppsala University, 75236, Uppsala, Sweden.
Petter KjellanderGrimsö Wildlife Research Station, Department of Ecology, SLU, 73091, Riddarhyttan, Sweden.
Erik Olof ÅgrenDepartment of Pathology and Wildlife Diseases, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), 75189, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ulrika Alm BergvallGrimsö Wildlife Research Station, Department of Ecology, SLU, 73091, Riddarhyttan, Sweden.
Abisko Scientific Research Station · SEUppsala University · SESwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SESwedish Veterinary Agency · SE

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-004004Naturvårdsverket 13/279Naturvårdsverket NV-04004-14
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWildlife traps are used in many countries without evaluation of their effect on animal welfare. Trap-capture of wild animals should minimise negative effects on animal welfare, irrespective of whether the animals are trapped for hunting, research, or management purposes. Live-trap capture of wild boar (Sus scrofa) followed by killing inside the trap by gunshot is a recently introduced but disputed hunting method in Sweden. Approval of trap constructions is based on gross necropsy findings of 20 trapped and shot wild boars. For improved animal welfare evaluation, our aim was to study wild boar behaviour during live-trapping in a 16 m

resultsThe wild boars spent less time resting in the evening than in the night and morning. Using Friedman's ANOVA, there was an overall difference in the time spent foraging. However, we only found a difference between the evening and morning in the Wilcoxon matched pairs test after the Sequential Bonferroni correction, where the wild boars spent more time foraging in the evening than in the morning. Single captured individuals showed more escape behaviours and reacted more strongly to external stimuli than individuals captured in a group. It was more common for animals to charge against the mesh walls of the trap upon human approach compared to upon initial capture when the trap door closed. Trap-related pathological findings due to trauma were documented in 13 of the 20 subadults that were necropsied. Behavioural alterations indicative of capture-induced stress (e.g. charging into the trap walls) were documented in trapped wild boars with no or minor physical injuries (e.g. skin abrasions, subcutaneous haemorrhage).

conclusionsBehavioural assessment provided valuable information for determination of capture-induced stress in wild boar when evaluating live-trapping in a corral-style trap, whereas pathological evaluation through necropsy did not fully reflect the animal welfare aspects of live-trapping. We emphasize the inclusion of species-specific behavioural data assessment for evaluation of capture-related stress during live-trapping and for testing of new trap constructions before approval.

Indexed as

Animal WelfareAnimalsAnimals, WildEscape ReactionFemaleMaleRestraint, PhysicalSus scrofaSweden3REthogramHealthHuntingManagementRefinementStressSus scrofaTrappingWildlife

Identifiers

PMID33168032
PMCPMC7654165
OpenAlexW3099827038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.