ArticleActa veterinaria Scandinavica2020
Wild boar behaviour during live-trap capture in a corral-style trap: implications for animal welfare.
Article in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- A behavioral study of live captured coypu (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- First Outbreak of African Swine Fever in Sweden: Local Epidemiology, Surveillance, and Eradication Strategies.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2024Article
- Refining animal welfare of wild boar (Sus scrofa) corral-style traps through behavioral and pathological investigations.PloS one · 2024Article
- Wild boar captured in a large corral-style trap or hunted: preliminary comparison of meat quality traits.Italian journal of food safety · 2023Article
- Stress Assessment of Wild Boar (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Assessing mammal trapping standards in wild boar drop-net capture.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Successful treatment of gastrocnemius muscle rupture in a long-tailed goral rescued from a live trap: a case report.Journal of veterinary science · 2022Article
- Measurement of catestatin and vasostatin in wild boar Sus scrofa captured in a corral trap.BMC research notes · 2021Article
- Observation of rescue behaviour in wild boar (Sus scrofa).Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Research priorities to fill knowledge gaps in wild boar management measures that could improve the control of African swine fever in wild boar populations.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2021Article
- A comparison of fragmenting lead-based and lead-free bullets for aerial shooting of wild pigs.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWildlife traps are used in many countries without evaluation of their effect on animal welfare. Trap-capture of wild animals should minimise negative effects on animal welfare, irrespective of whether the animals are trapped for hunting, research, or management purposes. Live-trap capture of wild boar (Sus scrofa) followed by killing inside the trap by gunshot is a recently introduced but disputed hunting method in Sweden. Approval of trap constructions is based on gross necropsy findings of 20 trapped and shot wild boars. For improved animal welfare evaluation, our aim was to study wild boar behaviour during live-trapping in a 16 m
resultsThe wild boars spent less time resting in the evening than in the night and morning. Using Friedman's ANOVA, there was an overall difference in the time spent foraging. However, we only found a difference between the evening and morning in the Wilcoxon matched pairs test after the Sequential Bonferroni correction, where the wild boars spent more time foraging in the evening than in the morning. Single captured individuals showed more escape behaviours and reacted more strongly to external stimuli than individuals captured in a group. It was more common for animals to charge against the mesh walls of the trap upon human approach compared to upon initial capture when the trap door closed. Trap-related pathological findings due to trauma were documented in 13 of the 20 subadults that were necropsied. Behavioural alterations indicative of capture-induced stress (e.g. charging into the trap walls) were documented in trapped wild boars with no or minor physical injuries (e.g. skin abrasions, subcutaneous haemorrhage).
conclusionsBehavioural assessment provided valuable information for determination of capture-induced stress in wild boar when evaluating live-trapping in a corral-style trap, whereas pathological evaluation through necropsy did not fully reflect the animal welfare aspects of live-trapping. We emphasize the inclusion of species-specific behavioural data assessment for evaluation of capture-related stress during live-trapping and for testing of new trap constructions before approval.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.